City of Burnside Development Assessment Panel Minutes Held ...
City of Burnside Development Assessment Panel Minutes Held ...
City of Burnside Development Assessment Panel Minutes Held ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Development</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>Minutes</strong> 2 April 2002Mr HH & Mrs JA Campbell - Report No. 5450.10<strong>Development</strong> Application No: 180/174/02/C1Location: 17 Cooper Angus Grove, Wattle ParkProposal: Tree removal (1)P4032Councillor Gilbert moved that it be a recommendation to Council that<strong>Development</strong> Application No. 180/174/02/C1 by Mr HH & Mrs JA Campbell bedeferred to the next meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> to be held on7 May 2002 allowing the applicant time to amend the application taking intoaccount the Arborist's report dated 22 February 2002.Seconded by Councillor MelickCARRIEDScott Salisbury Homes - Report No. 5450.12<strong>Development</strong> Application No: 180/1170/01/CALocation: 24 Pridmore Road, Glen OsmondProposal: Two, two storey detached dwellings and tree removalP4033Councillor Palk moved that it be a recommendation to Council that <strong>Development</strong>Application No: 180/1170/01/CA by Scott Salisbury Homes be refusedprovisional development plan consent and that the reasons for refusal are:The proposal will result in the removal <strong>of</strong> significant trees that form anotable visual element in the locality; andIt will result in an over development <strong>of</strong> the site in the context <strong>of</strong> theproposed site areas and density <strong>of</strong> the development in the locality.Seconded by Councillor CollinsCARRIEDMr S Douangphoumy & Mr VTY Low - Report No. 5450.14<strong>Development</strong> Application No: 180/22/02/C1Location: 31 Katoomba Road, BeaumontProposal: Tree RemovalCouncillor Hillier moved that it be a recommendation to Council that<strong>Development</strong> Application No: 180/22/02/C1 by Mr S Douangphoumy & Mr VTYLow be refused development approval and that the reasons for refusal are:That the trees form a notable visual element to the landscape <strong>of</strong> the localarea; andThey do not pose an unacceptable risk to private or public safety.Seconded by Councillor PalkLOSTP4034Councillor Collins moved that it be a recommendation to Council that<strong>Development</strong> Application No: 180/22/02/C1 by Mr S Douangphoumy & Mr VTYbe deferred to the next meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> to be heldon 7 May 2002 to allow the applicant to amend the application to provide onlyfor the removal <strong>of</strong> tree numbered 4 in the far North Western Corner marked onthe plan received by Council on 10 January 2002.S:\Agendas and <strong>Minutes</strong>\<strong>Development</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Panel</strong>\<strong>Minutes</strong>\2002\dap042002minuteswebsite.doc 8
Change language