Table 1. Current <strong>IGS</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>Center</strong>s.COD <strong>Center</strong> for Orbit Determination in Europe SwitzerlandEMR Energy, Mines & ResourcesCanadaESA European Space AgencyGermanyGFZ GeoForschungsZentrum GermanyJPL Jet Propulsion LaboratoryUSANGS National Geodetic SurveyUSAS10 Scripps Institution of Oceanography USA2. Current ProductsTable 2 summarizes products regularly produced by the <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>Center</strong>s. The standard forfilenamesisxxxwwwwd.extwhere xxx is a3-character <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>Center</strong> identifier (see Table l), wwwwa4-digit GPS weeknumber, da l-digit day-of-week (O means Sunday, 6means Saturday, 7 means the entire week),and extisa 3-character identifier to denote file ’’type”. Forexample, esa07 137.erp indicates earthrotation parameters (.erp) by the European Space Agency for theentire GPS week 713. Otherextensions include .eph, .spl ,and .sp3forprecise GPS ephemerides, and .sum for summaries. InTable 2, if a <strong>Center</strong> includes the product, the extension used in the file’s name is indicated,otherwise a - is indicated.Table 2.Products and Filename Extensions by <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>Center</strong>COD EMR ESA GFZ JPL NGS S10.spl orbits . eph .spl - ~.splsp3 orbits . eph .eph .eph - .SP3 .eph .SP3earth orientation .erp .erp . erp .erp .erp - .erpsummary file . sum sum . sum sum sum sum sum.
Precise GPS EphemeridesAll <strong>Center</strong>s provide GPS satellite ephemerides, although there are some differences in filenameextensions and formats. Five (COD, EMR, ESA, GFZ, and NGS) <strong>Center</strong>s use .eph as the filenameextension. Of these; four provide files in the sp3 format and one (GFZ) provides the sp 1 format.The other two <strong>Center</strong>s (.lPL and S10) provide orbit files in both the sp 1 and sp3 formats, and use.sp 1 and .sp3, respectively, as filename extensions. (For a description of these formats, see NOAATechnical Report NOS 133 NGS 46, “Extending the National Geodetic Survey Standard GPS OrbitFormats”, and “NGS Second Generation ASCII and Binary Orbit Formats and AssociatedInterpolation Studies”, both by B. Remondi.)One advantage of the sp3 format is that it allows a field for a clock estimate. Two <strong>Center</strong>s, CODand EMR, actually fill this field with satellite clock estimates, although their sign conventions areopposite.(However, because of clock dithering implemented as part of Selective Availability, it is a mistaketo think that clock solutions and precise ephemerides should necessarily be reported at the samefrequency. Essentially, GPS orbits are smooth and can be reasonably interpolated given dataspacing at intervals of 15 minutes, or even longer. GPS clock solutions, however, need to besupplied much more frequently (at least every 30 sec.) to derive accurate clock solutions atintermediate points by interpolation.)The sp3 format differs from the sp 1 format also in that it (i) allows an “orbit accuracy exponent”for each satellite, (ii) has an extra digit of precision in its position fields (accurate to 1 mm.), and(iii) allows velocity information as an option (currently exercised by none of the <strong>Center</strong>s).Given all this, there is little to recommend sp 1 over sp3, except perhaps that the sp 1 format has amuch shorter and easier-to-understand header. The sp 1 format persists most likely because it wasthe first format to gain widespread use and some software was developed around it.Before recommending sp3 as an “official” format, however, we ought to mention realdisadvantages of both it and its sp 1 precursor. Neither allows for exclusion of certain satellitesduring certain times in the file. Thus a <strong>Center</strong> cannot submit weekly sp3 files if a certain pm wasnot used during one day of the week. Also, because of headers and other adornments, customsoftware must be used (and maintained!) to do what would otherwise be simple operations.For example, it is tedious with these formats to (i) extract results from all <strong>Center</strong>s for a given prnat a certain time, or (ii) eliminate a certain prn from a file, or even (iii) concatenate files. While itis true that straightforward software can be written to perform these chores, a simpler “basic”format could be used which would rely solely on operating system commands (grep, cat, sortin Unix) for manipulations.An example of a single record from such a format (and all records have the same fields) might be:..e jpl 03199308221215 .0000 -15667.935591 15329.100213 14845 .251566-0.38
- Page 1 and 2: ●INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GEO
- Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS.FINAL AGENDA . .
- Page 5 and 6: 13:30 NGS14:00 S1014:30 EMR15:00 CO
- Page 7 and 8: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS:Prof. Gerhard
- Page 12 and 13: The first field identifies the reco
- Page 14 and 15: Summary InformationThe third produc
- Page 16 and 17: From Figure 1 we find that there ar
- Page 18: to define a reference clock in thei
- Page 22 and 23: SESSION 2(IGS orbit products)
- Page 24 and 25: 1. introductionThe main objectives
- Page 26 and 27: ecause of the above averaging. This
- Page 28 and 29: RMS per center (m)o 0 0 0 0 0 oA0Iv
- Page 30: Scale (ppb)I I I I I 11+-b~ul0Amo&I
- Page 33 and 34: and NGS. Note that the day to day v
- Page 35 and 36: Rotation around X-axis (mas)1&0 0o
- Page 37 and 38: discussed in Section 3 are here see
- Page 39 and 40: -----------------------------------
- Page 41 and 42: Residuals in Meters1 1 1 1 1 1 1=%m
- Page 43 and 44: Residuals inMeters11111cnficJJw-o A
- Page 45 and 46: I I I—Residuals in Meters..—.
- Page 47 and 48: 1111ResidualsMeters,—{44
- Page 49 and 50: Residuals in MetersI I I II I I IIc
- Page 51 and 52: Rms in MetersI 1 ! I 1 10 n0 a0n.ff
- Page 53 and 54: IGS- and the COM-sets, but that the
- Page 55 and 56: Table 4.1 N.A. Baseline Repeatabili
- Page 57 and 58: ..Figure 5.1:Clock solutions for FA
- Page 59 and 60:
specifically the preanalysis can be
- Page 61 and 62:
discussion, a question as to whethe
- Page 63 and 64:
SUMMARY OF SESSION 3This Session be
- Page 65 and 66:
IGS POSITION PAPER, IGS ANALYSIS CE
- Page 67 and 68:
and Earth orientation parameters (E
- Page 69 and 70:
LbPIERS and IGSCentral Bureausand D
- Page 71 and 72:
@ IGS will develop instructions, an
- Page 73:
2.2 Analysis Center System DesignFi
- Page 76 and 77:
applied to the solution in order to
- Page 78 and 79:
..standard deviations. This is conv
- Page 80 and 81:
known, the two solutions will be ad
- Page 82 and 83:
errors, and can therefore be used a
- Page 84 and 85:
International Terrestrial Reference
- Page 86 and 87:
Thus, there is the potential of fee
- Page 88 and 89:
90” 100” 110” 120” 130” 1
- Page 91 and 92:
adiation parameters for each satell
- Page 93 and 94:
Bock, Y., R.I. Abbot, C.C. Counselm
- Page 95 and 96:
SUMMARY OF SESSION 4This session st
- Page 97 and 98:
INTERNATIONAL EARTH ROTATION SERVIC
- Page 99 and 100:
x- differences with IERS0.001”I I
- Page 101 and 102:
SUMMARY OF SESSION 5In the last ses
- Page 103 and 104:
1) I(X3 PROCESSING/REPORTS/FORMATSS
- Page 105 and 106:
IGS should foster and encourage reg
- Page 107 and 108:
..INTERNATIONAL GPS SERVICE FORGEOD
- Page 109 and 110:
ortL.s.4
- Page 111 and 112:
1234567a91011121314IsIt17ItIs2C2122
- Page 113 and 114:
. Ruth Neilan16S Central BureauJet
- Page 115 and 116:
ON1T.>● Jim ZumbergeJet Propulsio
- Page 117:
PROPOSED ORGANIZATION OF THE INTERN