Y– differences with IERS1 1 I0,001”CODE,. . . . . . ., *...*.. .*.. *.*.,~..*”” ,. ..*,.. :*,,8-””*.. *.. . . ● ,. :‘** ..*.*”““”n.”*. ,.*.*.. * ‘*EMRt.*. .*...*””” ““B..”*”-*-*., *.. *.. *...* . ..+.. *...*GFZ,,..0.*.. .U ● ..*.. *.. *.. . . . . .. . . . . . ..*” *... *J ““.*..”’ .“V ..* . . .;. %.. .*,:“*”.~.*;. ,.*.,* %. I., ..b..*.-...“*8-*...*...*...*,*.” ..,..4JPL,..*...* ..*,,. *.. *... *...*..*● ✎✎ ✎ ✎ ✎ ✎● ...*.””●.*b-.”s, . . .* . ..*.. *.. *...*..&* Slo.. ... .● ✎ ✎ ✎✎✎☛● ✎✎✎ .,..* ....4.. *...*” “$.. ● ’ *.. *.. *NOAA,.*. -.*., .*.,..*. ● ● ✌✌✎ ☛✎✎✎☛. . . . ..*...-”✎☛✌✌✎ ✎‘.*● ✎ ✎ ✎ ●● ✌✎✎ ✎ ✎✍●✎✎☛L.. *. . .*... *.. .*... *.“*.’ .“*,‘“*I I 11992 1992.5 1993 1993.597Date (years)
SUMMARY OF SESSION 5In the last session, three additional presentations were given.In the first presentation, Dr. Martine Feissel highlighted the IERS studies of the <strong>IGS</strong> pole solutionswith particular emphases on the long term stability. It was noted that some GPS polar motion seriesexhibited drifts of several mas/year demonstrating the importance of VLBI. Also summarized werenew developments and improvements in precession and nutation models supported by VLBIobservations.In the second presentation given by Dr. Feissel on behalf of Boucher and Altamimi, the latest ITRFsolutions and coordinate sets were reviewed. The significance of the IERS/ITRF effort, whichprovides a common reference frame and connection to other space technique such as VLBI/SLRhas been greatly appreciated and acknowledged by all participants. The plans to make the ITRFand EOP mutually consistent at the sub-mas level for the 1993 Annual Report were alsohighlighted. This will mean a small re-alignment of the ITRF reference frame to maintain thecontinuity of EOP.In the last presentation, an interesting application of GPS with emphasis on the post-glacial upliftin Fennoscandia was presented. GPS data from the <strong>IGS</strong> core network, supplemented by anextensive regional network are being processed using a state of the art software (GIPSY II). Thisyielded a repeatability of a few ppb in distance for baselines of a few thousand km. Practically thesame results were obtained with the best <strong>IGS</strong> orbits held fixed or with orbits determined from bothregional and global (<strong>IGS</strong>) networks. Dr. Johansson expressed interest in using the future combined<strong>IGS</strong> orbits and also to become an <strong>IGS</strong> Associated <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>Center</strong>...98
- Page 1 and 2:
●INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GEO
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS.FINAL AGENDA . .
- Page 5 and 6:
13:30 NGS14:00 S1014:30 EMR15:00 CO
- Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS:Prof. Gerhard
- Page 10 and 11:
Table 1. Current IGS Analysis Cente
- Page 12 and 13:
The first field identifies the reco
- Page 14 and 15:
Summary InformationThe third produc
- Page 16 and 17:
From Figure 1 we find that there ar
- Page 18:
to define a reference clock in thei
- Page 22 and 23:
SESSION 2(IGS orbit products)
- Page 24 and 25:
1. introductionThe main objectives
- Page 26 and 27:
ecause of the above averaging. This
- Page 28 and 29:
RMS per center (m)o 0 0 0 0 0 oA0Iv
- Page 30:
Scale (ppb)I I I I I 11+-b~ul0Amo&I
- Page 33 and 34:
and NGS. Note that the day to day v
- Page 35 and 36:
Rotation around X-axis (mas)1&0 0o
- Page 37 and 38:
discussed in Section 3 are here see
- Page 39 and 40:
-----------------------------------
- Page 41 and 42:
Residuals in Meters1 1 1 1 1 1 1=%m
- Page 43 and 44:
Residuals inMeters11111cnficJJw-o A
- Page 45 and 46:
I I I—Residuals in Meters..—.
- Page 47 and 48:
1111ResidualsMeters,—{44
- Page 49 and 50: Residuals in MetersI I I II I I IIc
- Page 51 and 52: Rms in MetersI 1 ! I 1 10 n0 a0n.ff
- Page 53 and 54: IGS- and the COM-sets, but that the
- Page 55 and 56: Table 4.1 N.A. Baseline Repeatabili
- Page 57 and 58: ..Figure 5.1:Clock solutions for FA
- Page 59 and 60: specifically the preanalysis can be
- Page 61 and 62: discussion, a question as to whethe
- Page 63 and 64: SUMMARY OF SESSION 3This Session be
- Page 65 and 66: IGS POSITION PAPER, IGS ANALYSIS CE
- Page 67 and 68: and Earth orientation parameters (E
- Page 69 and 70: LbPIERS and IGSCentral Bureausand D
- Page 71 and 72: @ IGS will develop instructions, an
- Page 73: 2.2 Analysis Center System DesignFi
- Page 76 and 77: applied to the solution in order to
- Page 78 and 79: ..standard deviations. This is conv
- Page 80 and 81: known, the two solutions will be ad
- Page 82 and 83: errors, and can therefore be used a
- Page 84 and 85: International Terrestrial Reference
- Page 86 and 87: Thus, there is the potential of fee
- Page 88 and 89: 90” 100” 110” 120” 130” 1
- Page 91 and 92: adiation parameters for each satell
- Page 93 and 94: Bock, Y., R.I. Abbot, C.C. Counselm
- Page 95 and 96: SUMMARY OF SESSION 4This session st
- Page 97 and 98: INTERNATIONAL EARTH ROTATION SERVIC
- Page 99: x- differences with IERS0.001”I I
- Page 103 and 104: 1) I(X3 PROCESSING/REPORTS/FORMATSS
- Page 105 and 106: IGS should foster and encourage reg
- Page 107 and 108: ..INTERNATIONAL GPS SERVICE FORGEOD
- Page 109 and 110: ortL.s.4
- Page 111 and 112: 1234567a91011121314IsIt17ItIs2C2122
- Page 113 and 114: . Ruth Neilan16S Central BureauJet
- Page 115 and 116: ON1T.>● Jim ZumbergeJet Propulsio
- Page 117: PROPOSED ORGANIZATION OF THE INTERN