11.07.2015 Views

PMA209 2012 Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

PMA209 2012 Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

PMA209 2012 Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Core</strong> <strong>Avionics</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>In 2010, <strong>PMA209</strong> led the establishment of a FACE consortium made up ofindustry representatives and military aviation stakeholders. Their job includeddevelopment of common standards and protocols for the computing environment. InJanuary <strong>2012</strong>, the first FACE standard was published. This protocol will enable simpler,faster and more affordable integration of components and software enabled capabilities.Common standards will benefit platform capabilities by allowing more competitionacross industry, which brings down price and expands innovation across a broaderprovider base. It will also enable government entities to more directly provide andcontrol capability enhancements. FACE standards should be used for new avionicsdevelopments and analyzed for feasibility during system modifications or upgrades.5. Ensure that Performance-Based Acquisition and Logistics (PBA, PBL)contracts can effectively and affordably leverage common product upgradeopportunities, whether they involve Government or other vendor CommerciallyFurnished Equipment. Work to eliminate unique interfaces and proprietaryownership.DoD Directive 5000.1 (E1.16) states: “To maximize competition, innovation, andinteroperability, and to enable greater flexibility in capitalizing on commercialtechnologies to reduce costs, acquisition managers shall consider and useperformance-based strategies for acquiring and sustaining products and serviceswhenever feasible. For products, this includes all new procurements and majormodifications and upgrades, as well as re-procurements of systems, subsystems, andspares that are procured beyond the initial production contract award.”SECNAVINST 5000.2E (para. 2.4.7. Support Strategy) states: “PBL is thepreferred support strategy and method of providing weapon system logistics support.”In a performance-based acquisition or logistics construct, increased profitmotivates the provider to improve performance and reduce cost. The vendor isempowered to implement engineering changes without waiting for Government officesto identify and provide (unplanned and un-programmed) resources. Sustainmentstrategies should utilize the best public and private sector management capabilities andincorporate effective government and industry partnering initiatives. Effectiveperformance-based contracts require comprehensive planning using a full life cycleperspective. Unless properly structured, single point ownership of the weapon systemmay drive unique design work (or additional pass-through costs) when trying to upgradecore commodity systems, regardless of whether they are Commercially FurnishedEquipment (CFE) or Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). Care should be taken toavoid a contractual situation where the government is charged a premium or isprohibited from capitalizing on common or commodity system upgrades. In any case, aBusiness Case Analysis (BCA) should be conducted to compare alternative productsupport strategies and determine the best value solution for the government. The DoDProduct Support BCA Guidebook (issued April 2011) provides guidance for performingBCAs. The guidebook and additional supporting information can be found athttp://www.acq.osd.mil/log/mr/library.html.<strong>Core</strong> Section CAMP <strong>2012</strong> 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!