11.07.2015 Views

Index of EWU Authors - East West University

Index of EWU Authors - East West University

Index of EWU Authors - East West University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abstract <strong>of</strong> Published Papers 2008Liberal Arts and Social SciencesThe Dhaka <strong>University</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 183-198, BangladeshFebruary 2008A Critique <strong>of</strong> Critical Discourse AnalysisMuhammed Shahriar Haque*AbstractThe emergence <strong>of</strong> critical discourse analysis (CDA), as a reaction against a linguisticallybasednon-critical discourse analysis, has broadened the scope <strong>of</strong> discourse analysis. As anew ideological orthodoxy with a goal to make explicit the ideological bias in texts, CDA hasgenerated controversies and invites critical attention with both its advocates and criticsasserting their own respective positions. Critical discourse analysis has been criticised forbeing the most overtly political form <strong>of</strong> discourse analysis, <strong>of</strong>fering not only critique <strong>of</strong> theexisting social order, but espousing an agenda <strong>of</strong> change. Having taken up this ideologicalposition, it is absolutely essential that the methodology <strong>of</strong> CDA is unflawed and defensible.While its purpose <strong>of</strong> uncovering hidden agendas and motives that serve self-interest has beenapplauded, the tendency <strong>of</strong> CDA analysts to evaluate a text according to their own politicalcommitments, which may privilege particular meanings, has been strongly criticised. Thesecritiques, which concern mainly the epistemological question <strong>of</strong> how the term “critical” is tobe defined and the weaknesses in CDA methodology, are expressed from the westernideological perspective. My aim in this paper is to emphasize some <strong>of</strong> these comments inorder to see how the critics perceive CDA, and how the practitioners (<strong>of</strong> CDA) defendthemselves. A discussion <strong>of</strong> this nature would allow future practitioners to take account <strong>of</strong> thedebates in CDA and enable them to make compromises in order to improve the generalmethodology <strong>of</strong> this branch <strong>of</strong> linguistics.* Department <strong>of</strong> English, <strong>East</strong> <strong>West</strong> <strong>University</strong> 43 Mohakhali C/A Dhaka-1212.Email address: shahriar@ewubd.edu26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!