11.07.2015 Views

Part B, Working Papers, February 1974 - Special Collections - US ...

Part B, Working Papers, February 1974 - Special Collections - US ...

Part B, Working Papers, February 1974 - Special Collections - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dose to the target species and, at the same time, ndnimizes the impact of theherbicide on non-target species.Considerable effort has been expended in theconduct of research designed to improve on these herbicide delivery systems.When military organizations adapted the peaceful use of this forest managementtool to military purposes, the operation changed materially.The objectiveswere different, the delivery system was different and the effects were different.In military herbicide use, the principal objective was defoliation toimprove visibility.The military advantage of killing a tree, as contrastedwith simply defoliating it, was that the operation did not have to be repeated,at least with respect to that particular tree.Since the military need was toaffect most large trees regardless of species, the species differentiationcharacteristic of herbicides was presumably a disadvantage.jBecause of the generalized nature of the herbicide target, concentrationsof herbicide as used in military operations were much greater than wouldnormally be used in forestry operations to insure effect on the less susceptiblespecies as well as the most susceptible species.Lack of security for operationson the ground dictated the use of aerial application methods except for secureareas along roads and on the perimeters of military installations and securevillages.The aircraft used, fixed-wing airplanes and helicopters, were notsusceptible to careful monitoring for effect on target vegetation followingeach treatment.In a conventional forest-management use of herbicides, suchmonitoring would be essential.Where excessive damage to non-target speciesoccurred, the treatment would be modified or stopped, since improvement ofthe forest as a productive enterprise is generally the long-term objective.The military forces using herbicides were engaged in war and not conductingfield experiments with silvicultural systems.They appeared to have as littleconcern for the impact of war on the forests with respect to this military1-12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!