Book II - Wilbourhall.org

NOTES. 201•in private,' Aristoph. Vap. 1180. tov koivov—objectivegen. to crcjTrjpiai, but put first for the sake of the emphaticantithesis to kot' oIkov. vfiAs—he dexterously throws thecharge back on them. ^yviyvttrt —the prep, here has anadverbial force. Cf. c. 64, 1. 8v' olrCas f)(f^v—cf. c. 69,2, and 11, 3. This idiom is rare in other Attic prose writers(not found in orators).60, 5. KcUroi—there is no prothetis to this speech (see on c.86, 4), the reason being that in c. 6©. 3, and 66, 1 Thuc. explainsthe object which Pericles had in the IliffTtj, and so hadno need to insert it here. c)iol— the analysis makes therUrrii begin here. But the Schol. who notes on these wordsrapa-ypa.ipiKbi' iv dfivdnfri must have taken this to be part of thevpooifuov and thought that the rurns began with c. 61. (Ibegin the ricmt here with Fr. Muller, against the Schol.,Altinger and Leitschel, because the object of Pericles in theiria-Tii certainly was riji ix^ avrbv 6py^ xapaXifw roil 'AOrji^alovi,66, 1. T6 irapaypaiKhv comes in the rpoolfuof, but Thuc. mayhave meant the last part of 4 to represent this.) tmovt^P—here follows another'enthymeme : Yon are unjustly angrywith Pericles : for he is able, patriotic, honest and can tellyou what is best for you ; w ithout all these qualities, a statesmamis of little use. Therefore, as Pericles has them all, it isWTt)ng to blame him.' ovScv^