11.07.2015 Views

Space/time/frequency methods in adaptive radar - New Jersey ...

Space/time/frequency methods in adaptive radar - New Jersey ...

Space/time/frequency methods in adaptive radar - New Jersey ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

98The third scenario, shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.14 <strong>in</strong>cludes all of the data vectors <strong>in</strong> thetarget region from 150 km to 158 km, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the target area, <strong>in</strong> the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Thepresence of the target region causes an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the desired signal component <strong>in</strong>the estimated correlation matrix. This, put together with calibration errors, causesa deep signal cancellation by the SMI method. The eigencanceler, CSM, DCT, andDFT are only slightly affected by the presence of the signal <strong>in</strong> the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g set.Figure 5.15 displays the echo magnitude at the target range cell and for thebeamform<strong>in</strong>g at various angles. The figure was generated by scann<strong>in</strong>g the steer<strong>in</strong>gangle over the angular sector <strong>in</strong>dicated by the abscissa. The ga<strong>in</strong> of each techniqueis measured with respect to the output when the beamformer po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> the actualtarget direction (at 275 degrees). This plot emulates the <strong>radar</strong>'s search mode. Inthe case presented, the eigencanceler and the CSM patterns are very similar to oneanother. Near the target angle, the DFT and the SMI are also at a maximum. TheDCT pattern is at a maximum close to the target angle, but not directly on thesteer<strong>in</strong>g angle. This is due to the number of DCT terms used and the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g datautilized <strong>in</strong> the formation of the covariance matrix <strong>in</strong> this simulation.Typically, the cell under test as well as cells <strong>in</strong> its vic<strong>in</strong>ity are not <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong> the estimate of the covariance matrix. This implies a cumbersome procedure asdifferent covariance matrices need to be associated with different range cells. Robust<strong>methods</strong> such that the same covariance matrix can be used for all range cells are ofpractical <strong>in</strong>terest. The reason is that if the target signal is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the covariance,target cancellation may occur to the extent that the presumed steer<strong>in</strong>g vector isdifferent from the true target vector. Differences between the steer<strong>in</strong>g vector andthe true target vector may occur due to either po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g or calibration errors. Here,assume that the steer<strong>in</strong>g vector s is precisely the target vector. Let the covariancematrix without the target contribution be R, and with the target be RI . ThenR1 = PssH+R, where P is the power of the target. It is easy to show that the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!