- Page 4 and 5: R4PITFALLS AND BIASACKNOWLEDGMENTST
- Page 6 and 7: R6PITFALLS AND BIASREGIONAL TRENDS
- Page 9 and 10: R9RECOMMENDATIONSTaking into accoun
- Page 11 and 12: R119. Restructure teacher education
- Page 13 and 14: R13School readiness assessment emer
- Page 15 and 16: R15STREAMINGStreaming is the tracki
- Page 17 and 18: R17This disabling is particularly e
- Page 19 and 20: R19schools are more prevalent in Fi
- Page 21 and 22: R21PITFALLS AND BIAS INASSESSMENTCh
- Page 23 and 24: R23parental interest in education.
- Page 25 and 26: R25child does not come from a cultu
- Page 27 and 28: R27Language biasCulture and languag
- Page 29 and 30: R29Raven’s Coloured Progressive M
- Page 31 and 32: R31discrimination, leading in turn
- Page 33 and 34: R33CZECH REPUBLICKEY INSTITUTIONS I
- Page 35 and 36: R35The European Court of Human Righ
- Page 37 and 38: R37Advisory Facility or pediatricia
- Page 39 and 40: R39of the results (6). The analysis
- Page 41 and 42: R41to Bodewig and Rutkowski, 56 per
- Page 43 and 44: R43TABLE 6. Dropout rates in specia
- Page 45 and 46: R45- Pre-service and in-service pro
- Page 47 and 48: R47HUNGARYKEY INSTITUTIONS IN THE A
- Page 49 and 50: R49Parents are also involved in the
- Page 51 and 52: R51autism, dyslexia, and dyscalculi
- Page 53 and 54:
R53The developers also noted that c
- Page 55 and 56:
R55TABLE 8. Educational trajectorie
- Page 57 and 58:
R57the Public Education Act. Privat
- Page 59 and 60:
R59SERBIAKEY INSTITUTIONS IN THE AS
- Page 61 and 62:
R61pedagogical, focusing on diagnos
- Page 63 and 64:
R63Raven’s Coloured Progressive M
- Page 65 and 66:
R65TABLE 11. Educational attainment
- Page 67 and 68:
R67- School entry testing: There ar
- Page 69 and 70:
R69SLOVAKIAKEY INSTITUTIONS IN THE
- Page 71 and 72:
R71Socio-economic and cultural stat
- Page 73 and 74:
R73Pedagogical and other documentat
- Page 75 and 76:
R75- The fact that the assessment e
- Page 77 and 78:
R77TABLE 16. Number of years of com
- Page 79 and 80:
R79TABLE 19. Failure rates of all p
- Page 81 and 82:
R81- Reassessment: All pupils in sp
- Page 83 and 84:
R83WHILE THE GOVERNMENTS OF ALL FOU
- Page 85 and 86:
R85Aunio 2005, 48). Additionally, a
- Page 87 and 88:
R87NEW ZEALANDThere are no disabili
- Page 89 and 90:
R89intellectual, or emotional disab
- Page 91 and 92:
R91legislative provisions for inclu
- Page 93 and 94:
R93psychologists, speech therapists
- Page 95 and 96:
R95CONCLUSIONSAND RECOMMENDATIONSCO
- Page 97 and 98:
R97Children should not be removed f
- Page 99 and 100:
R99THE OVERREPRESENTATION OF PUPILS
- Page 101 and 102:
R101reliability for the WISC-IV for
- Page 103 and 104:
R103Scale [WAIS], Abbreviated Scale
- Page 105 and 106:
R105FIGURE A2. Sample Picture Conce
- Page 107 and 108:
R107REFERENCESAdvisory Committee on
- Page 109 and 110:
R109Bennett, John, and Collette Tay
- Page 111 and 112:
R111Coleman, James. 1966.Equality o
- Page 113 and 114:
R113Eurydice. 2008.Organization of
- Page 115 and 116:
R115Gärtner,Fania, and Peter J. Te
- Page 117 and 118:
R117Government of the Republic of M
- Page 119 and 120:
R119Jimerson, Shane, Angela Whipple
- Page 121 and 122:
R121Ladson-Billings, Gloria, and Wi
- Page 123 and 124:
R123Minić, Jelica. 2008.Human deve
- Page 125 and 126:
R125Novović, Zdenka, Mikloš Biro,
- Page 127 and 128:
R127Rothstein, Richard. 2004.Class
- Page 129 and 130:
R129Stojić, Tatjana, Darinka Radiv
- Page 131 and 132:
R131United Kingdom Education Act 19
- Page 133 and 134:
R133Williams, Paul, Lawrence Weiss,
- Page 136:
For Romani children in Central and