11.07.2015 Views

Entry Testing and the Overrepresentation of Romani ... - UR Research

Entry Testing and the Overrepresentation of Romani ... - UR Research

Entry Testing and the Overrepresentation of Romani ... - UR Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

R38PITFALLS AND BIAS<strong>and</strong> had to repeat <strong>the</strong> fourth grade. During <strong>the</strong> next school year he was bullied <strong>and</strong> teased for having gone to a“special school,” <strong>and</strong> his mo<strong>the</strong>r eventually transferred him to a primary school attended almost exclusively by<strong>Romani</strong> children. There is no legal mechanism or procedure for re-assessing pupils to determine if <strong>the</strong>ir placementshould be reconsidered or changed. Only if <strong>the</strong>re is a “significant change in special educational needs,” which isleft undefined, will <strong>the</strong>re be a reassessment or review <strong>of</strong> a pupil’s placement (Decree 73/2005 §9.3) <strong>and</strong> this reexaminationmust be requested by <strong>the</strong> child’s parent or legal guardian.TESTS USED FOR ASSESSING SCHOOL READINESS AND ABILITYThe methods <strong>of</strong> assessment by which <strong>Romani</strong> pupils were placed into special schools was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> considerations<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights in <strong>the</strong>ir judgment against <strong>the</strong> Czech Republic in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> D.H. <strong>and</strong>O<strong>the</strong>rs v. Czech Republic. The decision cited observations by <strong>the</strong> International Step by Step Association, <strong>the</strong> RomaEducation Fund, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Early Childhood <strong>Research</strong> Association, <strong>and</strong> concluded that language <strong>and</strong> culture,prior learning experiences, or lack <strong>of</strong> familiarity with testing situations were not considered in <strong>the</strong> assessment<strong>of</strong> <strong>Romani</strong> children in this case. The court also cited <strong>the</strong> fact that “[t]esting was done in a single administration,not over time. Evidence was not obtained in realistic or au<strong>the</strong>ntic settings where children could demonstrate<strong>the</strong>ir skills. Undue emphasis was placed on individually administered, st<strong>and</strong>ardized tests normed on o<strong>the</strong>r populations”(paragraph 44). An example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bias that is inherent in psychological tests, <strong>of</strong> not taking into account <strong>the</strong>ways that children experience <strong>the</strong> world, is recounted by Bedard (2008, 30) where a psychologist asked a <strong>Romani</strong>girl where her mo<strong>the</strong>r goes to buy bread <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> girl replied, “To <strong>the</strong> Vietnamese guy’s place.” Even though <strong>the</strong>owner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bakery where her mo<strong>the</strong>r shopped was in fact Vietnamese, <strong>the</strong> psychologist told <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r that<strong>the</strong> answer was incorrect, that she should have replied, “To <strong>the</strong> bakery.” Bedard (2008) also provides anecdotalevidence that psychological examinations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Romani</strong> children tend to last between 15-30 minutes, far less than<strong>the</strong> time it would take to conduct a thorough examination, collecting multiple data points through observations,interviews, <strong>and</strong> family histories in making a determination <strong>of</strong> disability status or a recommendation <strong>of</strong> placementto special schools.In an report commissioned by <strong>the</strong> government on <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> diagnostic tools used with children from sociallydisadvantaged backgrounds, including <strong>Romani</strong> children, Valenta <strong>and</strong> colleagues (2009) quote <strong>the</strong> Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Government on General Measures Exercising <strong>the</strong> Judgments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ECHR (Government Resolution No. 303 <strong>of</strong> 16 March2006), where <strong>the</strong> government states that it will take corrective measures <strong>and</strong> conduct an analysis <strong>of</strong> assessmentsused to diagnose intellectual ability <strong>of</strong> children that are used by Educational <strong>and</strong> Psychological Counseling <strong>and</strong>Special Educational Centers. Thus, <strong>the</strong> study was charged with collecting data on <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessmentswith <strong>Romani</strong> children who are at risk <strong>of</strong> being or who are socially excluded, including <strong>the</strong> methods by whichpsychological <strong>and</strong> counseling workers test children from diverse backgrounds <strong>and</strong> factors that can influence <strong>the</strong>test results, with <strong>the</strong> goal <strong>of</strong> improving <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>and</strong> cultural relevance <strong>of</strong> diagnostic tools <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> interpretations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!