GoB-UN POP 2010-2014 - UNFPA Botswana

Annex II: GoB-UN POP Action Plan 2013-2014 Results18 19and Resources MatricesAnnex II-a: Governance and Human Rights Promotion Results and Resources MatrixRESULTS INDICATOR, BASELINE & TARGETS RISK & ASSUMPTIONS IMPLEMENTINGPARTNERSUN AGENCYUNDAF OUTCOME 1:Effective and efficient delivery of services for fulfillment ofhuman rights• % level of access to services in aggregate terms (22%2008/2008)• Customers’ satisfaction index (25%-2005)• 55% (2016)• 75% (2016)R: Irregular SurveysR: Resource constraintsA: Annual surveys undertaken A: level ofaccess and satisfaction computed.ALL GovernanceImplementing partnersALLCP Outcome 1.1: National institutions strengthened andare accountable, responsive and contribute to the deliveryof 2016 NDP 10 goals, MDGs, Millennium Declaration andother international agreements and obligations• 76 % of National Institutions deliver effectively• In 2008/2009 73.9% of national institutions weredelivering effectively• Raise delivery rate to 76% of National by (2016)R: Resource constraintsA: Public and private sector governancestructures remain accountable andtransparent in the management ofresources in both the public and privatesectors.DPSM; BOCCIMBOCONGO; NSO & PSRU;OMBUDSMAN; NATIONALASSEMBLY; DCEC; BIDPA;BALA; AGC; StatisticsBotswanaUNICEFUNDPUNFPACP Output 1.1.1: Policies, legislation, programmes andprojects formulation is evidence and accelerates theachievement of Vision 2016 goals, NDP 10 goals, MDGs andMillennium Declaration• No. of policies, programmes and projects that areevidence based (have empirical evidence of baselinestudies, feasibility studies and research studies).• No inventory of laws, policies of projects formulated thatare evidence based.• Inventory of responsive policies, legislation, programmesand projects formulated (2010)• Gaps identified where responsive instruments should beinstitutionalized (2016)A: Continued Political will DPSM; BOCCIM;BOCONGO; NSO & PSRU;MLG;UNDP, UNICEFCP Output 1.1.3:Effective coordination of ratification, domestication,monitoring and reporting of international treaties andconventions• Ratification and domestication of treaties andconventions meet international standards.• Monitoring and reporting is compliant with internationalrequirements.• No data base on ratified and domesticated treaties andconventions existed in 2008.• No. treaties and conventions ratified and domesticated• Monitoring & reporting not meeting internationalrequirements.• Database on ratification and domestication established(2011)• 100% achievement of international monitoring andreporting requirements by (2016).R: Not enough human resources aremobilized to fulfill reporting requirementsAGC,MOFAICOPMLHAUNDP UNICEFUNFPAILOCP Output 1.1.4: Effective coordination of collection,analysis and use of quality disaggregated data (statistics) indecision making• Proportion of public sector institutions using qualitydisaggregated data in decision-making by 2014• Proportion of public sector institutions sharing andcoordinating analyses• Number of public sector institutions using disaggregateddata ( 2008)• 30% (2016) /30% (2016)R: Strategic level coordination isinsufficientR: No culture of sharing informationMFDP; Statistics Botswana UNFPA;UNICEFUNDPIFADCP Outcome 1.2: Strengthened human rights institutionsthat respond to the rights of vulnerable groups, includingchildren, women, PWA, refugees and disabled people• # of Human Rights institutions advocating for the rightsof vulnerable groups including youth, children, women,PWA, refugees and disabled.• In 2008 no institutions were advocating to the vulnerablegroups• 6 institutions advocating for the vulnerable by (2011)• A database of the institutions with their capacities (2011)• Yearly updates of their achievements.R: Inability of the institutions to report theirachievementHuman rights institutions remaincommitted to the cause of the vulnerablegroupsMOPAPABOCONGOMISA;MDJSOffice of the OmbudsmanMoESD; MLG & RD; CSOsUNICEFUNESCOUNDPUNFPAUNHCRUNOHCHR42 GoB - UN POP 2010 - 2014