11.07.2015 Views

Download - Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation

Download - Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation

Download - Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

N E U RO S U RG E RY A RT I C L ETable 2 Recursive partition<strong>in</strong>g analysis (RPA) of GBM survival based on Karnofsky performance status (KPS), the age of the patient, <strong>and</strong> treatment 53RPA class Def<strong>in</strong>ition Historical Median Survival Time Historical 1-Year SurvivalIII Age < 50, KPS ≥ 90 17.1 months 70%IV Age < 50, KPS < 90Age > 50, KPS ≥ 70, surgical removal with good neurologic function 11.2 months 46%V + VIAge ≥ 50, KPS ≥ 70, surgical removal with poor neurologic functionAge ≥ 50, KPS ≥ 70, no surgical removal 7.5 months 28%Age ≥ 50, KPS < 70Figure 5: An example of radiotherapy treatment volumes.The enhanc<strong>in</strong>g tumour is outl<strong>in</strong>ed as the gross tumourvolume (GTV). A 2.5cm marg<strong>in</strong> is then applied to accountfor the <strong>in</strong>filtrat<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> is referred to as the cl<strong>in</strong>icaltarget volume (CTV). A further 0.5 cm marg<strong>in</strong> for set uperror is then applied, the patient target volume (PTV). Theareas outside the GTV will <strong>in</strong>clude normal bra<strong>in</strong> at risk ofradiation <strong>in</strong>jury. (Picture courtesy of Dr Neil Burnet,Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge).tion <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with TMZ <strong>and</strong> radiotherapy<strong>in</strong> newly diagnosed GBM revealed amedian survival of 20.7 months with a twoyear median survival of 36%. 48RadiotherapyRadiotherapy has been the ma<strong>in</strong>stay of adjuvanttherapy for high grade gliomas s<strong>in</strong>cemultiple studies from the 1970s showed asurvival benefit. 49 However, attempts toimprove on the <strong>in</strong>itial benefits by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gdosage of radiation has failed to have anysuccess. Unfortunately the therapeuticw<strong>in</strong>dow for radiotherapy to the bra<strong>in</strong> is narrow<strong>and</strong> there is an <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>cidence of radiationnecrosis with <strong>in</strong>creased radiation dose.Part of the reason for this is the <strong>in</strong>ability ofconventional imag<strong>in</strong>g to identify <strong>in</strong>filtrat<strong>in</strong>gtumour. As a result radiotherapy plann<strong>in</strong>goutl<strong>in</strong>es the obvious tumour as the GrossTumour Volume (GTV). A 2.5cm marg<strong>in</strong> isthen applied to form the Cl<strong>in</strong>ical TargetVolume (CTV). A 0.5cm marg<strong>in</strong> is added toaccount for set up errors <strong>and</strong> patient movementto form the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Target Volume(PTV). In other words, a 3cm marg<strong>in</strong> is appliedaround the tumour that will conta<strong>in</strong> normalbra<strong>in</strong>. To reduce the risk of radiation necrosisthe dose is therefore limited (see Figure 5).Figure 6: An example of pseudoprogression <strong>in</strong> a patient with a glioblastoma be<strong>in</strong>g treated with concomitant Temozolomide <strong>and</strong>radiotherapy. Before start<strong>in</strong>g the adjuvant phase the tumour appears to have enlarged <strong>in</strong> size. This is not true progression butpseudoprogression as cont<strong>in</strong>uation of adjuvant Temozolomide shows excellent response after two more cycles.Although various radiotherapy regimeshave been proposed, traditionally two areused <strong>in</strong> HGG:1. Radical radiotherapy: gives 60 Gy doseover 30 daily fractions.2. Short Course/Palliative Radiotherapy:gives 30 Gy over two weeks <strong>in</strong> six fractions.As there is little plann<strong>in</strong>g patients can starttreatment very quickly <strong>and</strong> it is well tolerated.It is useful where patients are acutelydeteriorat<strong>in</strong>g.Cytotoxic ChemotherapyPCV was the st<strong>and</strong>ard adjuvant chemotherapeuticregime <strong>in</strong> use until the advent ofTemozolomide. PCV is nitrosurea basedchemotherapy provid<strong>in</strong>g a small survivalbenefit; a 5% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> two year survivalrates. 50 The treatment <strong>in</strong>volves a 10 day oralcourse of procarbaz<strong>in</strong>e, a s<strong>in</strong>gle oral dose ofCCNU <strong>and</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>travenous <strong>in</strong>fusion ofv<strong>in</strong>crist<strong>in</strong>e given <strong>in</strong> six weekly cycles.The <strong>in</strong>troduction of Temozolomide hasprovided some improvement <strong>in</strong> survival. It isgiven orally over five consecutive days with<strong>in</strong> a28 day cycle. Leucopenia <strong>and</strong> thrombocytopeniaare commonly associated side effectsof this treatment. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of radicalradiotherapy <strong>and</strong> daily, concomitantTemozolomide followed by six cycles of adjuvantTemozolomide has significantly alteredthe prognosis of GBM. Stupp et al. <strong>in</strong> a multicentretrial showed that at a median follow upof 28 months, the median survival was 14.6months <strong>in</strong> radiotherapy plus TMZ group ascompared to 12.1 months with radiotherapyalone. The two year survival rate was 26.5% vs10.4% while a five year review of the samepopulation has revealed 9.8% survival at fiveyears <strong>in</strong> the TMZ group compared to 1.9% <strong>in</strong>the radiotherapy group. 29 This represents asignificant advance over previous survivalstatistics <strong>in</strong> high grade glioma. The MGMTstatus was found to be the s<strong>in</strong>gle most importantpredictive factor for a favourableoutcome.It is now well recognised that MR appearancesimmediately after chemoradiotherapycan show apparent progression of disease–22% of patients <strong>in</strong> the study reported by Stuppet al did not receive the adjuvantchemotherapy phase due to presumed tumourprogression. Subsequent imag<strong>in</strong>g shows thatthese changes either stabilise or improve. Thispseudoprogression is more commonly seen <strong>in</strong>patients with methylated MGMT <strong>and</strong> is thoughtto represent a good prognostic sign of responseto therapy (see Figure 6).Treatment at Tumour ProgressionDespite the best management, virtually allpatients with HGG will develop recurrence oftumour at some po<strong>in</strong>t. Salvage therapies maybe considered depend<strong>in</strong>g on the patient’s cl<strong>in</strong>icalcondition. These may <strong>in</strong>clude:1. Surgery: Re-operation is associated withhigher morbidity <strong>and</strong> mortality than for theorig<strong>in</strong>al operation. However, it is an option<strong>in</strong> patients with a long progression freesurvival who have tumour that is maximallyresectable. Insertion of carmust<strong>in</strong>ewafers at this stage has been shown toimprove survival. 512. Radiotherapy: There has been somesuggestion that the toxicity of re-irradiationhas been overestimated. Re-irradiation isACNR > VOLUME 12 NUMBER 4 > SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2012 > 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!