<strong>Nieman</strong> Notes<strong>Nieman</strong> NotesCompiled by Lois FioreAt Unity ’99 the Topic Was JournalismThe conference offered a glimpse of what newsrooms could be.By Sam Fulwood IIITo many, the only real news thatcame out of the Unity ’99 conferencewas GOP presidential candidateGeorge W. Bush’s attempt tobypass the largest gathering of minorityjournalists ever even though he wascampaigning at the same time in Seattle.I know. I wrote the story thatconvinced him at the last minute toalter his schedule for a brief, impromptuwalkabout at the convention.But Unity ’99 wasn’t about presidentialpolitics.No, for most of the estimated 6,000people attending Unity ’99 last July,the gathering was the largest and mostmultiracial group of journalists to assemblein one place. Over the courseof five days, there were workshops,speeches and cocktail parties involvingmedia industry chatter. Those attendingwere primarily, but not exclusively,representing the Asian American JournalistsAssociation, the National Associationof Black Journalists, the NationalAssociation of HispanicJournalists and the Native AmericanJournalists Association.The oft-stated goal of Unity ’99 promoterswas to unite a divided collectiveof “journalists of color” into a singleforce. Implicit is their ultimate ambitionof pressing the establishmentmedia for greater racial, ethnic andgender diversity at all levels in thenation’s newsrooms.I feel that’s too much to ask; it is aburden on racial minorities that’s unfairand impossible to achieve. Whyshould black, Latino, Native Americanand Asian journalists be the exemplarsof unity, allowing the larger journalisticcommunity—or society at large—off the hook?Five years ago, at the first Unity conventionin Atlanta, the organizationsstruggled among themselves to pull offthe first combined convention of minorityjournalists. This year’s meetingwas even more difficult to make happenthan the first. During the run-up tothe 1999 convention, the constituentorganizations wrestled with whetherto hold the meeting in Washingtonstate, where voters had repealed affirmativeaction programs.If NABJ, the largest of the minoritygroups, had convinced its members tostay away, the turnout might have beenreduced and organizers might havebeen forced to cancel the long-plannedmeeting. Millions of dollars would havebeen lost to the organizations. In theend, black journalists retreated from apotentially crippling boycott threat, andthe convention was spared.“It’s a very, very powerful thing,”Catalina Camia, President of Unity: Journalistof Color, Inc., the umbrella organizationthat organized the convention,said to me as delegates arrived.“Our voices raised together are immanentlylouder and more powerful thana single voice.”Well, voices certainly were raised inprotest of the overwhelming whitenessof America’s news industry, aswell they should be. According to asurvey commissioned by the FreedomForum’s Media Studies Center in NewYork, 55 percent of journalists of colorat U.S. dailies expect to leave the business.Another study by the Latino journalistgroup drew attention to the “networkbrownout” on national newsbroadcasts, pointing out that less thana single percent of their reports wereabout Hispanics.And so it went, from an early-bird’sTown Hall meeting on Tuesday night(before more delegates arrived onWednesday) that allowed Seattle residentsto vent their frustrations over thelack of coverage in minority communitiesto a closing ceremony on Saturdaynight aimed at “Celebrating Our Future,”the themes of race and ethnicitywere front and center. One particularlyinsightful workshop session dealtwith “How TV News Portrayals of Raceand Class Impact Children.”But I’m not sure very many peoplegot the intended message. It’s an oldstory, better told in the 1969 KernerCommission Report, which lambastedthe media for covering the world “fromthe standpoint of a white man’s world.”Not much has changed on that front in30 years, except far too many Americanstune out when the subject arises.For me, deeply mired in the dailymuck of news, Unity ’99 offered a briefglimpse of what could be in the nation’snewsrooms. If given the opportunity,journalists of color will talk about thebroad and complex <strong>issue</strong>s that confrontall journalists. We might evenwrite a story that prompts a presidentialcandidate to adjust his schedule.To be sure, if journalism improves, thenation’s minority populations—includingjournalists—will gain. But Americawill benefit even more.<strong>Nieman</strong> Reports / Fall 1999 79
<strong>Nieman</strong> NotesThis forest-not-trees view of the conventioncan even make believers of thepeople who can change newsrooms.The New York Times’s WashingtonBureau Chief Michael Oreskes was oneof the many white men—mostly jobrecruiters and newsroom executives—making the rounds, as one put it to meyears ago, “to wave the company’s flag.”Just as minority journalists find themselvessurrounded by an ocean of whitefaces in their newsrooms, white recruitersat minority meetings are outnumberedand appear less than at ease.Yet, Oreskes told me a week afterreturning from Unity ’99, the experiencewas refreshing. “It was more thana convention of minorities,” he said. “Itwas more like the national journalismconvention that we don’t otherwisehave.”Oreskes spoke at one New YorkTimes-sponsored workshop on writingand beat reporting. He was struckby the eagerness of the college age andentry-level journalists in his audience.They pulled out notebooks andscribbled furiously. They asked probingquestions. They wanted to knowhow to hone their skills, how to developsources, how to write clear leadsand how to tell stories. Simply put,they wanted to know journalism.Later, Oreskes said he talked with adiverse group of people at the convention.Executives and human resourcepeople, photographers and Web pagedesigners, young eager beavers andgrizzled veterans. Race talk was minimal.Mostly the conversations wereabout the craft of journalism, hiringchoices, management decisions, ethicsand so forth. “I was amazed at therange of people who were there,” hesaid. “We don’t have, in a formal way,across the spectrum, any other placewhere so many people come togetherto talk about our craft. There are otherjournalism conferences such as ASNE(the American Society of NewspaperEditors) and IRE (Investigative Reportersand Editors), but those groups aremore limited and restricted to a narrowergroup of people.”He’s so right. And, that makes thepoint for racial diversity more eloquentlythan all the preaching to theconverted that otherwise transpires atminority gatherings. When more newsroomexecutives engage in conversationsabout their shared craft with minoritiesamong them, they’ll hear whatOreskes heard: Diversity can be fractiousand noisy and troublesome, but itmakes the best brand of journalism. ■Sam Fulwood III, a 1994 <strong>Nieman</strong>Fellow, covers race and politics as aWashington correspondent for theLos Angeles Times.—1943—Frank Kelly’s most recent book,“Harry Truman and the Human Family,”was published in September 1998by Capra Press. A new book—“Pioneersof Wonder: Conversations withthe Founders of Science Fiction,” byEric Leif Davin—contains a long sectionabout Kelly’s work as a sciencefiction writer during the 1930’s. Kelly,who serves as an editor of the NuclearAge Peace <strong>Foundation</strong>’s Waging PeaceJournal and as a director of the CaliforniaCenter for Civic Renewal, can bereached at his E-mail address,wagingpeace@napf.org. He’s hopingto attend the <strong>Nieman</strong> reunion in April2000 and would like to hear from anymembers of the <strong>Nieman</strong> class of 1942.—1955—Ian Cross and his wife, Tui, ofRumati, New Zealand, toured theUnited States in April and May by airand rail and were reunited with severalclassmates—Bob Drew, film documentaryproducer, in New York City; JoWoestendiek, <strong>Nieman</strong> spouse (of thenhusbandBill) and now Editor of aWinston-Salem monthly publication,and Sam Zagoria, former WashingtonPost reporter and later Ombudsman,now retired in Winston-Salem andFlorida. Cross is a former Wellingtonnewsman, author of several books, andformer head of New Zealand Television.His novel, “God Boy,” writtenbefore his <strong>Nieman</strong> year, has been convertedinto a play and opened inWellington and Christchurch to goodreviews. Both Jo and Sam (plus wifeSylvia) visited the Crosses in NewZealand in separate trips.—1956—Julius Duscha writes that he hasbeen doing some work for the NewsInc. newsletter. News Inc. is edited byDavid Cole, a friend of Duscha’s, in SanFrancisco. A recent piece of Duscha’s—“Death Takes a (Paid) Holiday at Papers”—discussedthe trend of newspaperscharging to write obituaries andstories on engagements, marriages anddivorces. Duscha concluded that, moreand more, these events are seen assources of advertising revenue ratherthan as legitimate subjects for newsstories.Desmond Stone passed away inDecember 1998. Stone, a native of NewZealand, was Editorial Page Editor atthe Rochester (NY) Democrat andChronicle from 1968 to 1985. Duringhis years as a reporter and editor, Stonewas known for his commitment to therights of racial minorities, victims ofviolence, and the mentally ill. In 1960he and Jack Germond co-wrote “Windsof Change,” a series that explored therealities of Rochester’s African-Americancommunity and anticipated therace riots that erupted in the city in1964. Stone was also the author of“Alec Wilder in Spite of Himself: A Lifeof the Composer,” published in 1996by Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press.—1963—<strong>Nieman</strong> Reports recently learnedthat Chiu-Yin Pun was killed in a trafficaccident in mainland China a fewyears ago. At the time his <strong>Nieman</strong> yearbegan, Pun was City Editor of the SingTao Evening News in Hong Kong. Hestudied economics at Canton <strong>University</strong>and began working as a reporter atthe Evening News in 1946. Pun studiedhistory and philosophy during his<strong>Nieman</strong> year.80 <strong>Nieman</strong> Reports / Fall 1999