27.11.2012 Views

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.2 The need<br />

<strong>What</strong> proportion of children experience literacy difficulties? An estimate (<strong>for</strong> England only,<br />

since the DfES’s remit is only <strong>for</strong> England) can be based on the results of National<br />

Curriculum assessments. Table 1 gives the percentages of children not yet achieving level 2<br />

in reading at the end of Key Stage 1 (age 7), or not yet achieving level 3 in English at Key<br />

Stage 2 (age 11), in 1998-2002.<br />

Table 1: Percentage of children in England achieving below level 2 in Reading in<br />

Key Stage 1 National Curriculum tests, or below level 3 in English at Key<br />

Stage 2, 1998-2002 *<br />

Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2<br />

Year Percentage Percentage<br />

1998 19% 7%<br />

1999 17% 7%<br />

2000 16% 6%<br />

2001 16% 7%<br />

2002 15% (provisional) 7% (provisional)<br />

* excluding absent pupils<br />

This shows that significant numbers of children experience literacy difficulties and are likely<br />

to have difficulty in coping <strong>with</strong> the steadily increasing demands of the curriculum in Key<br />

Stage 3 (and beyond).<br />

So what can be done <strong>for</strong> these children? We have identified 25 studies which are useful in<br />

attempting to answer this question.<br />

1.3 The schemes covered<br />

The titles of the 25 studies we have analysed, and the shorter names by which they are mainly<br />

referred to in this report, are as shown in Table 2. Several of the studies contained evaluations<br />

of more than one scheme, so in order to show the full coverage of the report, relevant studies<br />

are shown <strong>with</strong> their ‘alternative interventions’ (that is, the other approaches <strong>with</strong> which the<br />

main ones were compared) listed in italics below their full title. These alternative<br />

interventions bring the total of approaches evaluated up to nearly 40. In addition, many of the<br />

studies contained ‘no intervention’ (‘ordinary classroom teaching’) control groups, and these<br />

are also analysed here: studies <strong>with</strong> a well-defined no-intervention control group are marked<br />

<strong>with</strong> an asterisk.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!