27.11.2012 Views

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25 Family <strong>Literacy</strong><br />

Main references: Brooks et al. (1996a, 1997); Gorman and Brooks (1996)<br />

Date: Summer 1994-Summer 1995 (1 cohort of children in each term)<br />

Age-range: pre-school to Y2 (ages 3-6)<br />

Type of children: Low attainment, or at risk of it<br />

N of experimental group: 362 at outset, on about 20 sites. Smaller numbers at post-test and<br />

at each of three follow-ups (see below) because calculations based only on children <strong>with</strong><br />

complete data (‘returners’)<br />

N of control group: (no control group)<br />

N of alternative intervention group: (no alternative intervention group)<br />

Length of intervention in weeks: 12<br />

Writing assessment: on 7-point scale derived empirically from analysis of about 900 of the<br />

scripts, (see Gorman and Brooks, 1996a), later extended to 12-point scale (see Brooks et al.,<br />

1997)<br />

Sample sizes, average raw scores and s.d’s at pre- and post-test and 12-week, 9-month<br />

and long-term follow-ups, and gains from pre-test:<br />

N average score (s.d.) Gain<br />

pre-test vs 279 3.5 (1.6)<br />

post-test 4.1 (1.7) 0.6<br />

pre-test vs 179 3.7 (1.6)<br />

12 week 4.6 (1.4) 0.9<br />

follow-up<br />

pre-test vs 91 4.0 (1.5)<br />

9 month 5.4 (1.3) 1.4<br />

follow-up<br />

pre-test vs 175 3.4 (1.6)<br />

long-term 8.0 (1.7) 4.6<br />

follow-up<br />

Ratio gain: n/a<br />

Effect size: not stated and could not be calculated<br />

Statistical significances: p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!