What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Good impact – sufficient to double the standard rate of progress – can be achieved, and it is reasonable to expect it. • Most of the schemes which incorporated follow-up studies showed that the children maintained their gains. 18
CHAPTER 3 THE SCHEMES AND THEIR EVALUATIONS This chapter describes the 25 schemes, in three sections: - general schemes targeting reading and, in some cases, spelling - schemes which involve the use of ICT - the few experiments of any rigour which have investigated how to improve writing. Within each section the schemes are dealt <strong>with</strong> in alphabetical order. Each description contains an outline of the scheme itself, followed by a few details of its evaluation, and references. Where the report which is referenced may be difficult to obtain (<strong>for</strong> example, if it is an unpublished mimeograph), a contact address is also given. First, some general characteristics of the 25 schemes are summarised in Table 4 on page 20. 19
Page 1 and 2: What Works for Children with Litera
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES iii LIST OF
Page 5 and 6: 18 SPELLIT 122 19 THRASS 123 20 Tim
Page 7 and 8: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS OF INFORMATION PRO
Page 9 and 10: CHAPTER ONE FOCUS AND INTENTION OF
Page 11 and 12: 1.2 The need What proportion of chi
Page 13 and 14: B. Schemes involving ICT 21 AcceleR
Page 15 and 16: system that operates in England. Bu
Page 17 and 18: 2.1 Finding your way CHAPTER TWO SI
Page 19 and 20: As the Appendix again shows, most c
Page 21 and 22: There appeared to be no tendency fo
Page 23 and 24: 2.10 Partnership approaches for rea
Page 25: Somerset, THRASS (for reading, thou
Page 29 and 30: A. General schemes 3.1 Better Readi
Page 31 and 32: (4) Redcar and Cleveland Very few d
Page 33 and 34: Evaluations The full programme of t
Page 35 and 36: 3.4 Family Literacy (1) Basic Skill
Page 37 and 38: 3.5 Individual Styles in Learning t
Page 39 and 40: 3.7 Interactive Assessment and Teac
Page 41 and 42: 3.9 Multi-sensory Teaching System f
Page 43 and 44: 3.11 Parental Involvement in Haring
Page 45 and 46: 3.13 Phonological Awareness Trainin
Page 47 and 48: shows that the initiative continues
Page 49 and 50: (1) London and Surrey The Phonologi
Page 51 and 52: 3.17 Somerset Self-esteem and Readi
Page 53 and 54: Counselling by non-professionals pl
Page 55 and 56: Evaluation The programme was evalua
Page 57 and 58: 3.20 Time for Reading Do volunteers
Page 59 and 60: B. Schemes involving ICT 3.21 Accel
Page 61 and 62: 3.22 Integrated Learning Systems: t
Page 63 and 64: 3.23 RITA (Reader’s Intelligent T
Page 65 and 66: Yarrow and Topping (2001) studied 1
Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER 4 COMMENTS ON THE EVALUATIO
Page 69 and 70: Secondly, most of the tests provide
Page 71 and 72: REFERENCES Andrews, R., Burn, R., L
Page 73 and 74: Gorman, T.P. and Brooks, G. (1996).
Page 75 and 76: Moore, M. and Wade, B. (1998). ‘R
Page 77 and 78:
Torgerson, C., King, S. and Sowden,
Page 79 and 80:
A.1 Introduction to the evaluation
Page 81 and 82:
4) Range of tests used: In all, at
Page 83 and 84:
Where there is a control group but
Page 85 and 86:
A.2 Data on evaluated schemes 1 Bet
Page 87 and 88:
1 Better Reading Partnerships (3) C
Page 89 and 90:
1 Better Reading Partnerships (5) W
Page 91 and 92:
2 The Catch Up Project (1) The Pilo
Page 93 and 94:
2 The Catch Up Project (3) Cornwall
Page 95 and 96:
2 The Catch Up Project (5) Norfolk
Page 97 and 98:
3 Cued Spelling (2) Main reference:
Page 99 and 100:
4 Family Literacy (2) Hampshire Mai
Page 101 and 102:
5 Individual Styles in Learning to
Page 103 and 104:
- on comprehension, Inference Train
Page 105 and 106:
8 Knowsley Reading Project Main ref
Page 107 and 108:
9 Multi-Sensory Teaching System for
Page 109 and 110:
Follow-up: The Kirklees project pro
Page 111 and 112:
1-year follow-up, July 1979 (Tizard
Page 113 and 114:
12 Phono-Graphix (2) Surrey Main re
Page 115 and 116:
14 Reading Intervention (formerly C
Page 117 and 118:
14 Reading Intervention (formerly C
Page 119 and 120:
Average pre- and post-test raw scor
Page 121 and 122:
Statistical significances: between
Page 123 and 124:
16 Reciprocal Teaching Main referen
Page 125 and 126:
Pre- and post-test average scores (
Page 127 and 128:
SOMERSET (3) Main reference: Lawren
Page 129 and 130:
Ratio gain: n/a Statistical signifi
Page 131 and 132:
19 THRASS Main reference: Matthews
Page 133 and 134:
21 AcceleRead AcceleWrite (formerly
Page 135 and 136:
21 AcceleRead AcceleWrite (formerly
Page 137 and 138:
22 Integrated Learning Systems, Nat
Page 139 and 140:
24 Paired Writing (1) Main referenc
Page 141 and 142:
24 Paired Writing (2) Main referenc
Page 143 and 144:
25 Family Literacy Main references:
Page 145 and 146:
Table A.4: List of reading studies
Page 147 and 148:
Study Year group experimentals) The
Page 149 and 150:
BRP in Durham Y2 other adults 1.1 0
Page 151 and 152:
PAT Y4-7 teachers, 1-1 0.16 BRP in
Page 153 and 154:
Table A.7: List of spelling studies
Page 155 and 156:
How should this mass of comparative
show all

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?