27.11.2012 Views

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

What Works for Children with Literacy Difficulties? - Digital ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.22 Integrated Learning Systems: the National Council <strong>for</strong><br />

Educational Technology study<br />

Integrated Learning Systems is the general name <strong>for</strong> a number of computer-based learning<br />

systems, and <strong>for</strong> initiatives using them. The study summarised here is the one mounted by the<br />

National Council <strong>for</strong> Educational Technology (NCET, now the British Educational<br />

Communications and Technology Agency, BECTa) and evaluated by teams led by staff of the<br />

University of Leicester (phases I and II) and NFER (phase III).<br />

Scheme<br />

NCET provided a number of schools <strong>with</strong> both hardware and educational software designed<br />

to facilitate independent learning by pupils. The two main systems evaluated were<br />

SuccessMaker and Global Learning Systems. Both have extensive programs <strong>for</strong> both literacy<br />

and numeracy. Most schools in the study used the numeracy packages; only about half used<br />

the literacy packages. The literacy packages provided massive amounts of guided practice on<br />

all aspects of literacy; they also gave feedback on errors, and kept track of pupils’ progress <strong>for</strong><br />

their own and their teachers’ benefit.<br />

Evaluations<br />

(1) Mainstream<br />

As stated, Phase II of the project (1994-96) was evaluated by a team led by staff of the<br />

University of Leicester, and Phase III (1996-97) by NFER. (Phase I was smaller, though its<br />

conclusion <strong>for</strong> literacy was much the same as the later phases’.) Phase III was not covered in<br />

the first edition because it did not involve any children in Years 1-4, but is included now<br />

because of its Y5 group. Though the results of Phases II and III <strong>for</strong> numeracy were<br />

reasonable, those <strong>for</strong> literacy were unimpressive: no overall benefit compared to control<br />

groups. Two exceptions were noted in Phase II: a Special School where children in the<br />

control group outper<strong>for</strong>med those in the experimental group, and a mainstream primary<br />

school where the ILS group did significantly better than the control group, but only after<br />

teachers switched off all but the comprehension modules of the computer program - see<br />

section 2.6.<br />

References<br />

BECTA (1998); NCET (1994, 1996); Underwood (1997); Underwood and Brown (1997);<br />

Underwood et al. (1994)<br />

(2) For pupils <strong>with</strong> low attainments in reading<br />

Within the NCET study special attention was paid to pupils <strong>with</strong> special educational<br />

needs (Lewis, 1995) and other under-achievers (Gardner, 1995), on the hypothesis that<br />

they might particularly benefit from the technology. Lewis (1999) reviewed this<br />

work, including her own study, and several other UK interventions using ILS <strong>with</strong><br />

pupils <strong>with</strong> low attainments in reading. Because of small sample sizes and the<br />

existence of Lewis’s thorough review and analysis, none of the data from these studies<br />

are reproduced or analysed here. Lewis concluded (p.156, emphasis original) that<br />

teachers’ beliefs about the value of Integrated Learning Systems <strong>for</strong> pupils <strong>with</strong><br />

special educational needs or learning difficulties are not supported by the findings<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!