44The screen<strong>in</strong>g of the submitted proposals conductedby the Department of Domestic and<strong>Foreign</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> (DDFI) takes <strong>in</strong>to accountthe f<strong>in</strong>ancial and technical feasibility of theproject. A lack of exact regulations concern<strong>in</strong>gsocial and environmental impact assessmenth<strong>in</strong>ders a socio-ecological feasibility surveysecur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terests of smallholders and <strong>in</strong>digenouspeople.Referr<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>vestment climate, the one-stopservice <strong>in</strong>tended by the Lao Law on Promotionof <strong>Foreign</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> does not apply for <strong>FDI</strong> <strong>in</strong>land, as a bundle of different permits granted byvarious state authorities is mandatory.It can be observed that rules and regulationsconcern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment appraisal and concessionapproval are not always clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed, andadditionally guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the selection of landfor land concessions and its monitor<strong>in</strong>g are partlyunderdeveloped. For example, <strong>in</strong> VientianeProv<strong>in</strong>ce several concessions are <strong>in</strong> protected areas,some concessions are substantially larger thancontractually agreed upon, and district andprov<strong>in</strong>cial adm<strong>in</strong>istrations have granted concessionsthat were larger than the allowable size of3 and 100 hectare allotments. In many cases(89 out of 237 <strong>in</strong> Vientiane Prov<strong>in</strong>ce) writtenconcession agreements are lack<strong>in</strong>g, allow<strong>in</strong>g theblatant circumvention of statutory provisions.Consultations with local villagers are rare andrent-seek<strong>in</strong>g activities arise on all levels(National <strong>Land</strong> Management Authority 2009).The lack of a systematic overview detail<strong>in</strong>g thelocation, size, boundaries, etc. of the concessionsand the lease tracts makes regulat<strong>in</strong>g the grant<strong>in</strong>gof concessions difficult. With support from theLao-German <strong>Land</strong> Policy Development Project(LPDP/GTZ), <strong>in</strong> October of 2008, the <strong>Land</strong>and Natural Resources Research and InformationCenter of the National <strong>Land</strong> Management Authoritybegan a nationwide <strong>in</strong>ventory and surveyof all concession and lease tracts. However, itrema<strong>in</strong>s necessary to ensure the security of thecurrent use rights of the local population and their<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> the apportionment of concessiontracts. A first step to this end was taken <strong>in</strong> July of2009 when the LPDP/GTZ Project was given theauthorisation to extend the power to grant landtitles to rural regions as well.Due to many protests and conflicts aris<strong>in</strong>g fromthe allocation of land concessions without consultationof local villagers, a temporary memorandumon government concessions over 100 ha wasdeclared by Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister Bouasone Bouphavanhon 30 May 2007. In the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister’s 2007memorandum, contract farm<strong>in</strong>g was emphasisedas a better approach to <strong>FDI</strong> <strong>in</strong> the agriculturalsector that would ensure local level benefits. It hasbeen heavily promoted <strong>in</strong> northern Laos, wherereportedly over 10,000 ha have been planted undercontract schemes. Unfortunately, no <strong>in</strong>formationis available about impacts on the farmers’ livelihood.And still, most <strong>in</strong>vestors prefer <strong>in</strong>vestments<strong>in</strong> land <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>in</strong> contract farm<strong>in</strong>g.Data on the size of <strong>FDI</strong> <strong>in</strong> land and risks andopportunitiesS<strong>in</strong>ce 1993 Lao PDR became <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly thefocus of <strong>FDI</strong> and a massive surge can be observeds<strong>in</strong>ce 2002. Lao PDR has one of the lowestconcession rates <strong>in</strong> Southeast Asia (2-9 US$/ha); itgrants long concession periods and is characterisedby unclear regulations and low enforcement.The ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestors are Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Vietnam andThailand and the ma<strong>in</strong> products are rice, rubber,cassava, sugar, and pulp wood. Whereas Ch<strong>in</strong>ama<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>vests <strong>in</strong> rubber and rice, Thailand andVietnam together with Malaysia concentrate onrubber, sugar and cassava. Investors from Japan,India and the Scand<strong>in</strong>avian <strong>countries</strong> focus onpulp wood.A reliable data base is available for just two of the17 prov<strong>in</strong>ces of Lao PDR. GTZ supports the LaoPDR <strong>in</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g out an <strong>in</strong>ventory to collect dataabout all the different <strong>in</strong>vestment projects <strong>in</strong> thecountry, not only <strong>in</strong> the agricultural sector.
45Table 9: Area of land lease/concession projects of two prov<strong>in</strong>ces (2009)Vientiane Prov<strong>in</strong>ce(total surface 1,852,600 ha)Luang Namtha(total surface 961,200 ha)Number of projects Surface (ha) Number of projects Surface (ha)Total 237 391,709 107 25,366Concessions 198 390,374 23 19,291Lease 34 177 61 126Contract Farm<strong>in</strong>g 5 546 23 5,949SectorAgriculture 114 62,551 43 18,140Rubber 46 25,104 36 18,110M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 55 326,944 5 5,502Industry 30 714 12 48Investors are 1. Lao (149) 1. Lao (58)2. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese (25) 2. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese (45)3. S-Korean (24) 3. Thai (1)Source: GTZ Lao PDR, 2009Collected data for the prov<strong>in</strong>ces Vientiane andLuang Namtha are already available. They coveronly active and implemented projects and areassembled <strong>in</strong> Table 9.• To get a comprehensive overview, a close cooperationwith local authorities is necessary.Hence projects not <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the <strong>in</strong>terests oflocal authorities will hardly f<strong>in</strong>d the requiredsupport.• It is not always clear where the <strong>in</strong>vestor comesfrom. To circumvent legal requirements, it seemsto be possible to make use of Lao citizens toconduct bus<strong>in</strong>ess on behalf of foreign <strong>in</strong>vestors.Therefore, <strong>in</strong>vestments cannot be allocated todomestic or foreign <strong>in</strong>vestments unambiguously.• For some <strong>FDI</strong> <strong>in</strong> land, there are no writtencontracts or documents. They are based on oralagreements.The <strong>in</strong>ventory has brought transparency to the<strong>in</strong>vestment projects of two prov<strong>in</strong>ces. The Laoparliament has recognised the efforts and agrees toa follow-up project extend<strong>in</strong>g the GTZ activitiesnationwide.S<strong>in</strong>ce data for the other prov<strong>in</strong>ces are not yetavailable it is difficult to estimate <strong>FDI</strong> <strong>in</strong> land forthe whole country. In a pre-study to the GTZproject, estimates amounted to approximately 2-3million ha of land that is already under concession(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g concessions for m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g). This is about10-15% of the whole Lao PDR territory.Additional demand for land orig<strong>in</strong>ates from Ch<strong>in</strong>a(about 1 million ha) and Kuwait (about 200,000ha) for food production. Apart from food, thereare many projects for the production of agro-fuel,ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Jatropha.Rubber plant<strong>in</strong>g on burned siteRubber plantation <strong>in</strong> Luang Namtha