2003 Entries into Kerchner's MtDNA Test Results Log

2003 Entries into Kerchner's MtDNA Test Results LogMtDNA Haplogroup per HVR1 Results: T1HVR2 MtDNA Test Results: 73G, 199C, 263G, 309.1C, 315.1CDate MtDNA Test Was Ordered: 2002Comments: I have tracked my mtDNA received from my mother, Louise Randall (Smith) Parker,b. 23 Nov 1903 in Tisbury, Dukes County, MA; to Mary Elizabeth (Judkins) Smith, b. 7 Mar 1880in Norway, Oxford County, ME; to Mary Ann (Bartle) Judkins, b. 9 Mar 1851 in Mineral Point,Iowa County, WI; to Mary (Mitchell) Bartle, b. 22 Dec 1829 in Austell, Cornwall, England; toElizabeth (Towells) Mitchell, bap. 7 Apr 1799 in West Quantoxhead, Somersetshire, England.Email address (To use delete [AT] and add @ sign in that position): bparker[AT]saclink.csus.eduGuest: Stephan M JankerDate-Time: Monday, August 11, 2003 at 08:54:18 (CDT)Testing Company Used: Oxford AncestorsHVR1 MtDNA Results: 16179T, 16356CMtDNA Haplogroup per HVR1 Results: U 4 (Ulrike)HVR2 MtDNA Test Results: Not tested.Date MtDNA Test Was Ordered: Spring 2002Comments: The earliest date in my maternal lineage safed by records is the marriage of MarjanaWróž / Wrauz. She married in Krapkowice in 1765, 20th of January. Krapkowice (GermanKrappitz) is situated on the Oder River in Upper Silesia region (southwestern Poland). Herfather's surname leads to the neighboured parish of Bro¿ec.Email address (To use delete [AT] and add @ sign in that position): sjanker[AT]bo.drs.deGuest: NoreenDate-Time: Sunday, August 10, 2003 at 05:45:29 (CDT)Testing Company Used: Oxford AncestorsHVR1 MtDNA Results: 16162G, 16209C, 16215GMtDNA Haplogroup per HVR1 Results: HHVR2 MtDNA Test Results: Not TestedDate MtDNA Test Was Ordered: 2001Comments: Earliest known maternal ancestor is Sarah Farmer (no details known) the mother ofMary Ann Kemsley born 1819 in Wouldham, Kent England, died 1886 in Wouldham. Allancestors believed to be English. OA have no matches for my mtDNA results, they commented asfollows... "The sub group that you have been placed in accounts for approximately 1.5% of ourMatriLine customers. The majority of people in this group have a mutation at position 16162.There are also quite a few with mutations at both positions 16162 and 16209. Therefore it seemslikely that the mutation in your sequence at position 16215 is a relatively 'recent' mutation, as wehave seen no other people who have these same three mutations as yourself."Email address (To use delete [AT] and add @ sign in that position): encee31[AT]yahoo.co.ukGuest: Shelley LePoudre WiebeDate-Time: Saturday, August 09, 2003 at 18:36:29 (CDT)file:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/mtdnalog/mtdnalog2003.htm (29 of 46)3/8/2010 8:19:48 PM