12.07.2015 Views

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.2. Source <strong>identification</strong> 135the latter conditions can significantly differ from the structures real-life operat<strong>in</strong>gconditions. The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>put-output models (FRFs, modal models) for the purpose<strong>of</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g operational forces from measured response signals, can therefore (<strong>in</strong>some cases) lead to <strong>in</strong>accurate force estimates.As an alternative to the use <strong>of</strong> forced excitation test<strong>in</strong>g and EMA, use can bemade <strong>of</strong> ambient vibration test<strong>in</strong>g and OMA. This technique has the advantagethat no artificial excitation devices are required and that the structure can bemodelled under realistic operat<strong>in</strong>g conditions while us<strong>in</strong>g all ambient vibration asexcitation. A drawback to the use <strong>of</strong> this method is that the result<strong>in</strong>g output-onlydynamic model (e.g., cross power spectra, operational modal model) can not bedirectly used for the purpose <strong>of</strong> relat<strong>in</strong>g measured response signals to the forcesact<strong>in</strong>g on the structure.In this Chapter, the possibility will be exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g the sensitivity-basednormalization technique (<strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4) <strong>in</strong> order to correctly normalizethe operational mode shapes. Once this task is successfully accomplished, FRFscan be synthesized by means <strong>of</strong> expression (6.3).6.2.4 Solv<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>verse problemOnce a dynamic model (e.g., FRFs) <strong>of</strong> the test structure is obta<strong>in</strong>ed, equation(6.2) makes it possible (at least <strong>in</strong> theory) to estimate unknown forces that actupon the structure by measur<strong>in</strong>g the result<strong>in</strong>g structural responses. This can beachieved by f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a solution F (ω f ) to the <strong>in</strong>verse problem that m<strong>in</strong>imizes thefollow<strong>in</strong>g cost function:N f∑K LS= (ɛ(ω f )) H ɛ(ω f ) (6.5)f=1withɛ(ω f ) = X(ω f ) − H(ω f )F (ω f ) (6.6)Regardless <strong>of</strong> the derivation <strong>of</strong> the dynamic model (EMA or OMA), the reliableestimation <strong>of</strong> forces from a given set <strong>of</strong> response data is not a simple task. Due tothe ill conditioned nature <strong>of</strong> the FRF matrix <strong>in</strong> (6.2), <strong>in</strong>version problems can occurespecially for frequencies close to resonances, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> that case H(ω) is dom<strong>in</strong>atedby a s<strong>in</strong>gle mode. Consequently, an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite amount <strong>of</strong> solutions exist that m<strong>in</strong>imizecost function (6.5). In order to f<strong>in</strong>d a unique solution, an additional constra<strong>in</strong>t is<strong>of</strong>ten applied to ill conditioned <strong>in</strong>verse problems (Friswell and Mottershead, 2001).In practice, this can be achieved by add<strong>in</strong>g additional terms to the cost function.In case <strong>of</strong> the force <strong>identification</strong> problem, the follow<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>t can be chosen:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!