12.07.2015 Views

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2. Non-stationary data 55some <strong>of</strong> the patches.In (Mevel et al., 2002), the idea was explored to re-scale and merge the datafrom the different patches before perform<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>system</strong> <strong>identification</strong> step. Forthis purpose, the subspace-based output-only <strong>identification</strong> technique was adaptedto handle multi-patch measurement setups.In this chapter, similar <strong>techniques</strong>, for use with multi-patch non-stationary outputonlydata, will be presented <strong>in</strong> the <strong>frequency</strong>-<strong>doma<strong>in</strong></strong>. Two different methods arepresented for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g correctly re-scaled mode shape estimates from a s<strong>in</strong>gle estimationprocedure applied to the complete set <strong>of</strong> data gathered by all patches.The unwanted non-stationary effects are removed respectively before and after the<strong>system</strong> <strong>identification</strong> step.Apart from be<strong>in</strong>g a lot faster than the classic approach, when a high number<strong>of</strong> patches is used, a s<strong>in</strong>gle set <strong>of</strong> natural frequencies and damp<strong>in</strong>g estimates is obta<strong>in</strong>edfrom the data <strong>in</strong> the different patches. Moreover, s<strong>in</strong>ce all data is processedtogether <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle estimation procedure, no mode pair<strong>in</strong>g approach is requiredfor the re-scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the mode shapes.The discussed re-scal<strong>in</strong>g approaches were tested on two <strong>application</strong>s where measurementsare <strong>of</strong>ten, if not always, performed <strong>in</strong> patches: Scann<strong>in</strong>g Laser Vibrometry(SLV) and ambient civil eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g test<strong>in</strong>g. First, SLV results were usedfrom experiments performed on a clamped plate. Both situations with controlledacoustic excitation and uncontrolled ambient traffic excitation were considered forvalidation purposes. Next, the results <strong>of</strong> multi-patch ambient vibration test<strong>in</strong>g, onthe stairway case study structure <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2, were compared to the<strong>in</strong>put-output forced excitation test results described <strong>in</strong> that same chapter. Lastbut not least, the re-scal<strong>in</strong>g approaches were tested on the Z24 bridge bench markdata. These results can be found <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5 which is partly dedicated to theZ24 bridge benchmark.Throughout this Chapter, a <strong>frequency</strong>-<strong>doma<strong>in</strong></strong> output-only ML <strong>identification</strong> techniquewill be used for the modal parameter estimation. However, it should be notedthat the discussed <strong>techniques</strong> are not restricted to the ML estimator and that thepresented re-scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>techniques</strong> can be used with other <strong>system</strong> <strong>identification</strong> <strong>techniques</strong>.3.2 Non-stationary dataDifferent sorts <strong>of</strong> non-stationarity can be dist<strong>in</strong>guished. A first type to be consideredis excitation level <strong>in</strong>stability, where the level <strong>of</strong> excitation becomes a function<strong>of</strong> time. In this case, re-scal<strong>in</strong>g methods that are simply based on the computation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!