12.07.2015 Views

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

application of frequency-domain system identification techniques in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.3. Extension to output-only data 31where X [s] (ω) and X [s],ref (ω) are respectively the (N o × 1) and (N ref × 1) vectorscomputed <strong>in</strong> (2.54) and (2.55). The time w<strong>in</strong>dow W (e.g., Hann<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>dow) isused to reduce the negative effect <strong>of</strong> leakage (S. Lawrence Marple, 1987). Choos<strong>in</strong>ga higher amount <strong>of</strong> data samples D <strong>in</strong> each segment, at the expense <strong>of</strong> thenumber <strong>of</strong> averages P , will reduce the effect <strong>of</strong> leakage. Moreover, a higher spectralresolution will be obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>frequency</strong>-<strong>doma<strong>in</strong></strong>. However, the result<strong>in</strong>gdecrease <strong>in</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> averages P leads to a higher stochastic uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty onthe estimates. In practice, a trade-<strong>of</strong>f will have to be made between the mentionedcontradict<strong>in</strong>g aspects.The basic idea beh<strong>in</strong>d allow<strong>in</strong>g an overlap between the data segments consists<strong>in</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g a better contribution <strong>of</strong> all samples <strong>of</strong> the raw time history responsedata to the averaged estimate. If no overlap is considered, the contribution <strong>of</strong>samples near the edges <strong>of</strong> the segments will be suppressed by the presence <strong>of</strong> theHann<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>dow.The correlogram approachApart from the periodogram approach, another method can be considered for theestimation <strong>of</strong> cross power spectra <strong>of</strong> the response signals. The unbiased discretetime<strong>doma<strong>in</strong></strong> correlation estimate between the signal x [o] (m) (m = 0, . . . , M − 1)<strong>of</strong> a response o and the signal x ref[i](m) <strong>of</strong> a reference-response i is given by⎧⎪⎨⎪⎩R [o,i] (k) = 1 M−k−1 ∑M−kx [o] (m + k)x ref[i](m) for 0 ≤ k ≤ M − 1m=0R [o,i] (k) = 1M−|k|−1∑M−|k|x ref[i](m + |k|)x [o] (m) for − (M − 1) ≤ k < 0m=0(2.57)with k the correlation time. The biased correlation estimate uses 1/M rather than1/(M − k). Instead <strong>of</strong> comput<strong>in</strong>g the correlation estimate by means <strong>of</strong> multiplicationand summation <strong>of</strong> time samples, a high speed implementation <strong>of</strong> (2.57) ispossible by apply<strong>in</strong>g the FFT to the time signals, cross multiply<strong>in</strong>g the Fouriertransforms and tak<strong>in</strong>g the real part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>verse FFT to the cross products. The<strong>in</strong>verse FFT results <strong>in</strong> a periodic correlation function estimate. The bias errorthat is <strong>in</strong>troduced due to this circular convolution can be avoided by zero-padd<strong>in</strong>gthe orig<strong>in</strong>al time records (Bendat and Piersol, 1980). The cross power functionestimates can then be obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Fourier transform<strong>in</strong>g the correlation functionsobta<strong>in</strong>ed from (2.57)S [o,i] (ω) = T sM ∑k=−MW (k)R [o,i] (k)e −iωkTs (2.58)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!