12.07.2015 Views

Public Rights of Way Report - Chiltern Evergreen3

Public Rights of Way Report - Chiltern Evergreen3

Public Rights of Way Report - Chiltern Evergreen3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oad. The proposed diversion is only an additional 150 metres in length and isreasonably convenient to the public. There will be an improvement in ease <strong>of</strong>walking as a part <strong>of</strong> the route will use existing surfaced pavement alongsidethe A4165 compared to the existing situation where the whole <strong>of</strong> the route ison unmade rural footpaths.7.61 The diversion will provide an opportunity for people to use the route not onlyfor recreational purposes but also as an access to the new railway station atWater Eaton Parkway.7.62 The proposed diversion will not impact on the connectivity <strong>of</strong> the network asa whole. The proposed diversion provides a safer route for users. It removesthe need to cross both the heavily trafficked and dualled A34 and the railwayat-grade.7.63 The diversion will result in the extinguishment <strong>of</strong> a substantial length <strong>of</strong> crossfield paths to be replaced by a short section <strong>of</strong> unmade path along a fieldmargin plus the use <strong>of</strong> an existing pathway. The proposed diversion isbeneficial to the land served by the existing footpath. There will be littleimpact on the land where the footpath is to be created as it is on a field.7.64 In these respects it is considered that the proposed diversion <strong>of</strong> the Gosfordand Water Eaton Number 4 footpath [FP 229/4] meets the tests and providesan acceptable alternative to the current at-grade crossing.CONCLUSION7.65 Overall the integrity <strong>of</strong> the public rights <strong>of</strong> way network in the area ismaintained. Where at-grade crossings are being closed either a replacementbridge crossing or diversion to a nearby bridge have been proposed. All‘through’ routes are being retained, albeit by a diversion in some cases.7.66 Given that the primary use <strong>of</strong> the public rights <strong>of</strong> way network in the area isrecreational, diversions which result in small increases in distance are notconsidered to be inconvenient to the public. This is reinforced by the lownumber <strong>of</strong> users that have been shown to use the footpaths and bridleways inthis area.ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT50CHILTERN RAILWAYS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!