Public Rights of Way Report - Chiltern Evergreen3

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Name:Merton FootOS Grid Ref: SP 56292 18526Railway Ref.:Type:OXD 22m 01chPublic FootpathFunction:Usage:Proposal:Alternativesconsidered andreasons for dismissal:Close crossing and provide footbridge at crossing location.1. Close crossing without replacement – unacceptable impact on public footpath network2. Retain and upgrade crossing - undesirable due to increased safety risk resulting from increased speed and frequency of trains.3. Close crossing and divert footpath via bridge proposed adjacent to Manor Farm crossing – length of diversion consideredexcessive in relation to function of path within local public footpath network.Key considerations in determining proposal:Railway engineeringand operations:Land and property:Planning:Ecology:Retention of crossing undesirable from safety point of view. Access difficulties for bridge construction.Land unregistered on both sides of railway. Areas of third party land required for bridge construction.Potential visual impact of bridge option.Wendlebury Ponds adjacent. Stand-off from ponds required to avoid potential impact of bridge structure.ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CHILTERN RAILWAYSA6
Name:Wendlebury FootOS Grid Ref: SP 56133 18265Railway Ref.:Type:Function:Usage:Proposal:Alternativesconsidered andreasons for dismissal:OXD 22m 17chPublic FootpathPublic footpath (recreational use).Appears reasonably well used.Close crossing and footpath to southeast of railway. Route is duplicated by Public Bridleway that currently crosses railway atBeebont crossing (see below).1. Retain and upgrade crossing - undesirable due to increased safety risk resulting from increased speed and frequency of trains.2. Close crossing and divert footpath via proposed footbridge at Merton foot crossing – longer diversionary route than thatproposed for some journeys.Key considerations in determining proposal:3. Close crossing and provide footbridge on site of crossing – Visual impact of additional structure cannot be justified givenproximity to other proposed new bridges.Railway engineeringand operations:Land and property:Planning:Ecology:Retention of crossing undesirable from safety point of view. Access difficulties for bridge construction.Small areas of third party land potentially required for footbridge construction.Potential visual impact of bridge option is slight due to proximity to motorway bridge.No obvious impact.ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CHILTERN RAILWAYSA7
Page 1:
Transport and Works Act 1992Transpo
Page 6 and 7:
1 INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION TO THE S
Page 8:
2 LEGAL TESTS IN RESPECT OF EXTINGU
Page 11 and 12: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT6
Page 13 and 14: REGIONAL POLICY3.4 The South East P
Page 17 and 18: 4.6 Level crossings are now seen as
Page 19 and 20: 4.14 The Rail Standards & Safety Bo
Page 21 and 22: 4.19 Network Rail, as the operator
Page 23 and 24: 4.27 A number of general comments w
Page 25 and 26: • Oddington Level Crossing - supp
Page 29 and 30: Table 5.1:Chiltern Railways Biceste
Page 31 and 32: Sustrans National Cycle Route map a
Page 33 and 34: Yew Tree Farm [FP 318/2]5.23 This i
Page 35 and 36: 5.37 A site visit in July 2009 show
Page 37 and 38: COMPLIANCE WITH THE DISABILITY DISC
Page 39 and 40: London Road Level Crossing6.11 The
Page 41 and 42: 6.22 There are no footpath diversio
Page 43 and 44: 6.37 There are no footpath diversio
Page 45 and 46: CONCLUSION6.52 In summary there are
Page 47 and 48: Whether it is Reasonably Practicabl
Page 49 and 50: 7.15 The survey in June 2009 showed
Page 51 and 52: 7.30 The diversion will result in t
Page 53 and 54: 7.45 The diversion will result in t
Page 55 and 56: oad. The proposed diversion is only
Page 57 and 58: Name:Tubbs LaneOS Grid Ref: SP 5905
Page 59 and 60: Name:Langford Lane Level CrossingOS
Page 61: Name: Elm Tree Farm Number 1OS Grid
Page 65 and 66: Name:Oddington FootOS Grid Ref: SP
Page 67 and 68: Name:Oddington Level CrossingOS Gri
Page 69 and 70: Name:Oddington Number 5 CrossingOS
Page 71 and 72: Name:Islip Level CrossingOS Grid Re
Page 73 and 74: Name: Water Eaton Number 5OS Grid R
Page 75 and 76: Name: Gosford and Water Eaton Numbe
Page 77 and 78: Name: Gosford and Water Eaton Numbe
Page 80 and 81: Annex CDescription of Public Rights
Page 82 and 83: Location ofPublicCrossingsIslip Foo
Page 84 and 85: Table D.1 Chiltern Railways Oxford
Page 86 and 87: NORTH OF GAVRAY DRIVE [FP 129/3]Pho
Page 88 and 89: LONDON ROAD LEVEL CROSSINGPhotograp
Page 90 and 91: ELM TREE FARM NUMBER 1 [FP 398/6]Ph
Page 92 and 93: BEEBONT BRIDLEWAY [BR 157/4]Photogr
Page 94 and 95: YEW TREE FARM [FP 318/2]Photograph
Page 96 and 97: ISLIP FOOT [FP 318/7]Photograph 21:
Page 98 and 99: ISLIP LEVEL CROSSINGPhotograph 25:
Page 100 and 101: GOSFORD AND WATER EATON NUMBER 10 [
Page 102 and 103: Botom of kerbDROPICICPipePipeICIC I
Page 105: 100LOCATION OFFOOTBRIDGETrackLevel
Page 111 and 112: CFMotelMastMastPeartree HillFarmSPC
Page 113 and 114:
#IA! B#ILangford Lane Level Crossin
Page 115 and 116:
!P#IQ#IIslip Level Crossing!#IR#I S
show all

Public Rights of Way Report - Chiltern Evergreen3

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?