29.11.2012 Views

Jews in Leipzig - The University of Texas at Austin

Jews in Leipzig - The University of Texas at Austin

Jews in Leipzig - The University of Texas at Austin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2: “Wh<strong>at</strong> would the Führer, Adolf Hitler, say?”: Jewish life under the<br />

Nazis, 1933-38<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the assumptions th<strong>at</strong> fueled the Zionist position dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1920s were<br />

given the strongest possible valid<strong>at</strong>ion with the entry <strong>in</strong>to government on 30 January,<br />

1933 <strong>of</strong> Adolf Hitler. Start<strong>in</strong>g with the nasty discrim<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the April 1933 boycott<br />

and the laws regard<strong>in</strong>g the civil service and judiciary, followed by the Nuremberg laws <strong>in</strong><br />

1935, a wave <strong>of</strong> anti- Semitism swept the city. <strong>Jews</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Leipzig</strong> found themselves<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly on the outside look<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>. <strong>The</strong>ir responses to th<strong>at</strong> exclusion—the cre<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong><br />

a whole new set <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> which <strong>Jews</strong> could oper<strong>at</strong>e, and then the victory <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Zionist position—reflect both radical change <strong>in</strong> response to radically altered positions,<br />

and a surpris<strong>in</strong>g degree <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity, even as the divisions over n<strong>at</strong>ional identity,<br />

religion, and ethnicity cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong> a dram<strong>at</strong>ically altered form.<br />

<strong>Jews</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Leipzig</strong> were remarkably adaptive to their new conditions, but it is utterly<br />

clear th<strong>at</strong> a large range <strong>of</strong> options were taken from them beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1933. <strong>The</strong> deb<strong>at</strong>e<br />

over identity—the central question <strong>of</strong> Jewish life <strong>in</strong> Germany—changed <strong>in</strong> tone from<br />

1933, as we will see. Gone were the free exchanges between Zionists and<br />

assimil<strong>at</strong>ionists. Gradually, th<strong>at</strong> deb<strong>at</strong>e was exchanged for a consensus <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong><br />

Zionism. This was no free choice, though. Partly <strong>in</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> the danger <strong>of</strong> their<br />

situ<strong>at</strong>ion, and partly under direct pressure from their tormentors, the <strong>Jews</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Leipzig</strong> shut<br />

down the market <strong>of</strong> ideas from 1933. <strong>The</strong>re was no more room for an argument about<br />

who they were. From th<strong>at</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t, the central fact <strong>of</strong> life was the simple drive for survival,<br />

and many did not survive.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!