12.07.2015 Views

Indigenous Peoples, Poverty, and Self-Determination in Australia ...

Indigenous Peoples, Poverty, and Self-Determination in Australia ...

Indigenous Peoples, Poverty, and Self-Determination in Australia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CornellCentral governments, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, as illustrated by theCanadian case, have been reluctant to engage with the issuesthat form the core of <strong>Indigenous</strong> concerns. They have preferredto focus on the socio-economics of <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>and</strong> typicallyhave <strong>in</strong>terpreted self-government as an adm<strong>in</strong>istrative project <strong>in</strong>which <strong>Indigenous</strong> populations are allowed to manage programsdesigned—usually by central governments—to address socialproblems <strong>and</strong> economic marg<strong>in</strong>ality.In <strong>Australia</strong>, for example, Smith (2002: 3) observes that “<strong>in</strong> recentyears self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation… has been rejected as an active federalgovernment policy position.” Accord<strong>in</strong>g to S<strong>and</strong>ers (2002: 2),the current government “has preferred to focus its rhetoric on‘practical’ matters such as ‘overcom<strong>in</strong>g disadvantage’ <strong>and</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>gbetter ‘outcomes’ for <strong>Indigenous</strong> people <strong>in</strong> areas like employment,hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> health, while seem<strong>in</strong>gly studiously avoid<strong>in</strong>g anyreference to self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation…” (see also Dodson <strong>and</strong> Pritchard1998).Similarly, recent government policy <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, whilepay<strong>in</strong>g some lip-service to the idea of self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation, has beenconcerned primarily with “clos<strong>in</strong>g the gaps” <strong>and</strong> for a time evenadopted this as its official policy slogan. “Clos<strong>in</strong>g the Gaps,” remarksLoomis (2000: 11), “means improv<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>stream governmentservices <strong>and</strong> target<strong>in</strong>g fund<strong>in</strong>g to Maori provider groups. In effect,better State <strong>in</strong>tervention.” Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Humpage (2002: 45-6),the thrust of Maori affairs policy “has been the state’s desire toma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> protect its own legitimacy from potential threats,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Maori calls for self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation focused on theestablishment of autonomous <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong> shared governancearrangements at the national level.” She goes on to po<strong>in</strong>t out thatsee, for example, Ivison, et al. (2000); Ivison (2002, 2003); Arthur (2001);S<strong>and</strong>ers (2002); Nettheim, et al. (2002); Fleras <strong>and</strong> Spoonley (1999); Durie(2000); Price (2001); Royal Commission on Aborig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>Peoples</strong> (1996); Mc-Neil (1998); Mohawk Council of Akwesasne (2002); Getches (2001); Wilk<strong>in</strong>s(2002); Cornell, et al. (2002).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!