<strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>, <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Determ<strong>in</strong>ation</strong>Berger, T.R. 1985. Village Journey: The Report of the AlaskaNative Review Commission. New York: Hill <strong>and</strong> Wang.Bern, J., <strong>and</strong> S. Dodds. 2000. ‘On the plurality of Interests:Aborig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>Self</strong>-Government <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Rights,’ <strong>in</strong> D. Ivison, P.Patton <strong>and</strong> W. S<strong>and</strong>ers, eds., Political Theory <strong>and</strong> the Rights of<strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.163-79.Case, D., <strong>and</strong> D.A. Voluck. 2002. Alaska Natives <strong>and</strong> AmericanLaws. 2 nd edition. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.Ch<strong>and</strong>ler, M.J., <strong>and</strong> C. Lalonde. 1998. ‘Cultural cont<strong>in</strong>uity asa hedge aga<strong>in</strong>st suicide <strong>in</strong> Canada’s First Nations.’ Journal ofTranscultural Psychiatry 35: 191-219.Cornell, S. 1988a. The Return of the Native: American IndianPolitical Resurgence. New York: Oxford University Press.-----. 1988b. ‘The transformations of tribe: Organization <strong>and</strong>self-concept <strong>in</strong> Native American ethnicities.’ Ethnic <strong>and</strong> RacialStudies 11(1): 27-47.Cornell, S., M. Jorgensen, <strong>and</strong> J.P. Kalt. 2002. ‘The First NationsGovernance Act: Implications of research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from theUnited States <strong>and</strong> Canada. Report to the Office of the BritishColumbia Regional Vice-Chief, Assembly of First Nations.’Native Nations Institute for Leadership, Management, <strong>and</strong>Policy, The University of Arizona.Cornell, S., <strong>and</strong> J.P. Kalt. 1992. ‘Reload<strong>in</strong>g the dice: Improv<strong>in</strong>gthe chances for economic development on American Indianreservations,’ <strong>in</strong> S. Cornell <strong>and</strong> J.P. Kalt, eds., What Can TribesDo? Strategies <strong>and</strong> Institutions <strong>in</strong> American Indian EconomicDevelopment. Los Angeles: American Indian Studies Center,UCLA. pp. 1-59.30
Cornell-----. 1995. ‘Where does economic development really comefrom? Constitutional rule among the contemporary Sioux <strong>and</strong>Apache.’ Economic Inquiry 33: 402-26.-----. 1997a. ‘Cultural evolution <strong>and</strong> constitutional public choice:Institutional diversity <strong>and</strong> economic performance on AmericanIndian reservations,’ <strong>in</strong> J. Lott, ed., Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>and</strong> Evolution <strong>in</strong>Economics: Essays <strong>in</strong> Honor of Armen A. Alchian. London <strong>and</strong>New York: Routledge. pp. 116-42.-----. 1997b. ‘Successful economic development <strong>and</strong>heterogeneity of governmental form on American Indianreservations,’ <strong>in</strong> M.S. Gr<strong>in</strong>dle, ed., Gett<strong>in</strong>g Good Government:Capacity Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Public Sectors of Develop<strong>in</strong>g Countries.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for InternationalDevelopment. pp. 257-96.-----. 1998. ‘Sovereignty <strong>and</strong> Nation-Build<strong>in</strong>g: The developmentchallenge <strong>in</strong> Indian country today.’ American Indian Culture <strong>and</strong>Research Journal 22(3): 187-214.-----. 2000. “Where’s the glue: Institutional <strong>and</strong> culturalfoundations of American Indian economic development.” Journalof Socio-Economics 29: 443-70.-----. 2003. ‘Alaska native self-governance <strong>and</strong> service delivery:What works?’ Jo<strong>in</strong>t Occasional Papers <strong>in</strong> Native Affairs, no.2003-1. Native Nations Institute for Leadership, Management,<strong>and</strong> Policy, <strong>and</strong> Harvard Project on American Indian EconomicDevelopment. Tucson: Udall Center for Studies <strong>in</strong> Public Policy,The University of Arizona.Cornell, S., J.P. Kalt, M. Krepps, <strong>and</strong> J. Taylor. 1998. ‘AmericanIndian gam<strong>in</strong>g policy <strong>and</strong> its socio-economic effects.’ Reportto the National Gambl<strong>in</strong>g Impact Study Commission. July.Cambridge, MA: Economics Resource Group.31
- Page 1 and 2: Joint Occasional Papers on on Nativ
- Page 3 and 4: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 5 and 6: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 7 and 8: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 9 and 10: CornellObviously the differences ar
- Page 11 and 12: CornellCommonalitiesAlthough there
- Page 13 and 14: CornellThe present inquiry, while p
- Page 15 and 16: CornellCentral governments, on the
- Page 17 and 18: Cornellstark discrepancy between In
- Page 19 and 20: Cornellusual economic factors such
- Page 21 and 22: CornellThe meaning and role of self
- Page 23 and 24: Cornellis needed. Those nations mak
- Page 25 and 26: CornellThe U.S. government had inad
- Page 27 and 28: CornellSuch variation does not nega
- Page 29 and 30: CornellBern and Dodds discuss the s
- Page 31 and 32: Cornellgroup identities and boundar
- Page 33 and 34: CornellThe overall policy implicati
- Page 35: CornellReferencesAnaya, S.J. 1996.
- Page 39 and 40: CornellHarvard Project on American
- Page 41 and 42: CornellJorgensen, M., and J. Taylor
- Page 43 and 44: CornellNative Nations Institute for
- Page 45 and 46: CornellWakeling, S., M. Jorgensen,
- Page 47 and 48: Joint Occasional Papers on Native A