<strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>, <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Determ<strong>in</strong>ation</strong>Deloria, V., <strong>and</strong> C.M. Lytle. 1983. American Indians, AmericanJustice. Aust<strong>in</strong>: University of Texas Press.Dodson, M., <strong>and</strong> S. Pritchard. 1998. ‘Recent developments <strong>in</strong><strong>Indigenous</strong> policy: The ab<strong>and</strong>onment of self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation?’<strong>Indigenous</strong> Law Bullet<strong>in</strong> 4(15): 4-6.Durie, M. 1998. Te Mana, Te Kāwanatanga: The Politics of Māori<strong>Self</strong>-<strong>Determ<strong>in</strong>ation</strong>. Auckl<strong>and</strong>: Oxford University Press.-----. 2000. ‘Contemporary Maori development: Issues <strong>and</strong> broaddirections.’ Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper no. 7/2000. Development StudiesProgramme, University of Waikato.Egnal, M. 1996. Divergent Paths: How Culture <strong>and</strong> InstitutionsHave Shaped North American Growth. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.Esber, G.S. 1992. ‘Shortcom<strong>in</strong>gs of the Indian selfdeterm<strong>in</strong>ationpolicy,’ <strong>in</strong> G. Castile <strong>and</strong> R. Bee, eds., State <strong>and</strong>Reservation: New Perspectives on Federal Indian Policy. Tucson:University of Arizona Press. pp. 212-23.Fleras, A. 1999. ‘Politicis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>digeneity: Ethno-politics <strong>in</strong> whitesettler dom<strong>in</strong>ions,’ <strong>in</strong> P. Havemann, ed., <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong>’ Rights<strong>in</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>, Canada, <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Auckl<strong>and</strong>: OxfordUniversity Press. pp. 187-234.Fleras, A., <strong>and</strong> J.L. Elliott. 1992. The ‘Nations With<strong>in</strong>’:Aborig<strong>in</strong>al-State Relations <strong>in</strong> Canada, the United States, <strong>and</strong> NewZeal<strong>and</strong>. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Fleras, A., <strong>and</strong> P. Spoonley. 1999. Recall<strong>in</strong>g Aotearoa: <strong>Indigenous</strong>Politics <strong>and</strong> Ethnic Relations <strong>in</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Auckl<strong>and</strong>: OxfordUniversity Press.Getches, D.H. 2001. ‘Beyond Indian law: The Rehnquist court’spursuit of states’ rights, color-bl<strong>in</strong>d justice <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>streamvalues.’ M<strong>in</strong>nesota Law Review 86(2): 267-362.32
CornellHarvard Project on American Indian Economic Development.1999. Honor<strong>in</strong>g Nations: Tribal Governance Success Stories,1999. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on American IndianEconomic Development, Harvard University.-----. 2000. Honor<strong>in</strong>g Nations: Tribal Governance Success Stories,2000. Cambridge: Harvard Project on American IndianEconomic Development, Harvard University.-----. 2003. Honor<strong>in</strong>g Nations: Tribal Governance Success Stories,2002. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on American IndianEconomic Development, Harvard University.Havemann, P. 1999. ‘Chronology two: Twentieth-century public<strong>in</strong>ternational law <strong>and</strong> <strong>Indigenous</strong> peoples,’ <strong>in</strong> P. Havemann, ed.,<strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>Peoples</strong> Rights <strong>in</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>, Canada, <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong>.Auckl<strong>and</strong>: Oxford University Press. pp. 18-21.Henson, E., J.B. Taylor, S. Beane, K. Bishop, S.S. Black,K.W. Grant, M. Jorgensen, J. K<strong>in</strong>g, A.J. Lee, H. Nelson, <strong>and</strong>Y. Roubideaux. Forthcom<strong>in</strong>g. ‘Native America at the NewMillenium.’ In Harvard Project on American Indian EconomicDevelopment, American Indian Research <strong>and</strong> Grants AssessmentProject: A Report to the Ford Foundation.Humpage, L.V. 2002. ‘Clos<strong>in</strong>g the gaps? The politics ofMaori affairs policy.’ Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MasseyUniversity.Hunter, B. 1999. ‘Three nations, not one: <strong>Indigenous</strong> <strong>and</strong> other<strong>Australia</strong>n poverty.’ Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper No. 1/1999. Centre forAborig<strong>in</strong>al Economic Policy Research, <strong>Australia</strong>n NationalUniversity.<strong>Indigenous</strong> Constitutional Convention Secretariat. c. 1999.‘<strong>Indigenous</strong> Constitutional Strategy, Northern Territory.’33
- Page 1 and 2: Joint Occasional Papers on on Nativ
- Page 3 and 4: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 5 and 6: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 7 and 8: CornellIndigenous Peoples, Poverty
- Page 9 and 10: CornellObviously the differences ar
- Page 11 and 12: CornellCommonalitiesAlthough there
- Page 13 and 14: CornellThe present inquiry, while p
- Page 15 and 16: CornellCentral governments, on the
- Page 17 and 18: Cornellstark discrepancy between In
- Page 19 and 20: Cornellusual economic factors such
- Page 21 and 22: CornellThe meaning and role of self
- Page 23 and 24: Cornellis needed. Those nations mak
- Page 25 and 26: CornellThe U.S. government had inad
- Page 27 and 28: CornellSuch variation does not nega
- Page 29 and 30: CornellBern and Dodds discuss the s
- Page 31 and 32: Cornellgroup identities and boundar
- Page 33 and 34: CornellThe overall policy implicati
- Page 35 and 36: CornellReferencesAnaya, S.J. 1996.
- Page 37: Cornell-----. 1995. ‘Where does e
- Page 41 and 42: CornellJorgensen, M., and J. Taylor
- Page 43 and 44: CornellNative Nations Institute for
- Page 45 and 46: CornellWakeling, S., M. Jorgensen,
- Page 47 and 48: Joint Occasional Papers on Native A