30.11.2012 Views

Thesis (PDF) - Signal & Image Processing Lab

Thesis (PDF) - Signal & Image Processing Lab

Thesis (PDF) - Signal & Image Processing Lab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94 CHAPTER 6. EXTREMA-WATERSHED TREE EXAMPLE<br />

tree and shape tree on the corrupted image shown in Fig. 6.20. A difference between<br />

the two approaches is shown in Fig. 6.21. It is interesting that there is a major<br />

difference in the erosion result, but almost no difference in the opening result. This<br />

is because in the erosion picture of the extrema watershed tree trenches are revealed.<br />

The trenches in extrema watershed tree exposes flat zones located deep into the tree.<br />

There is no similar effect in a shape tree because its tree structure is different.<br />

Note that noise connected to the image border is not filtered in the Tree of shapes<br />

and is filtered in the EWT tree. Noise is left by the shape tree filter because its<br />

“fillhole” operator does not consider this boundary noise as a hole that can be filled<br />

during tree creation process.<br />

6.3.3 Filtering using Extrema watershed tree versus tradi-<br />

tional morphological filtering<br />

In this section, filtering results using the EWT are compared with traditional erosion,<br />

dilation, opening, closing, open-close, close-open operators and median filter in a<br />

complete lattice of gray level functions. In Figs. 6.24 and 6.24, results of conventional<br />

morphological filters (erosion, dilation, opening, closing) are shown. As expected,<br />

their results are not symmetric with respect to a gray and dark pixels. Because of<br />

that, those filters cannot be compared with the extrema-watershed tree.<br />

An additional morphological filter that has a pseudo symmetrical effect is a com-<br />

bined open-close or close-open filters as described in Chapter 8 of [3]. Their results<br />

are shown in Fig. 6.26. In Fig. 6.27 a median filter result is shown and compared to<br />

the EWT result. Those two figures enable a comparison between the proposed filter<br />

and traditional approaches. It can be seen the the EWT filtered result is in general<br />

similar to an open-close and close-open results, but without a bias towards dark pixels<br />

as a close-open or towards a light pixels as an open-close filter. The median filter<br />

is unbiased, but a number of noisy pixels have survived the filtering by it, and the<br />

median filter lacks other important features. For example it is not an idempotent<br />

filter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!