30.11.2012 Views

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were increasingly seen as monopolists of the worst kind—tools of the<br />

Crown’s repression, selling the liberty of England to guarantee themselves<br />

a monopoly profit. The attacks against these monopolists were<br />

harsh: Milton described them as “old patentees and monopolizers in<br />

the trade of book-selling”; they were “men who do not therefore labour<br />

in an honest profession to which learning is indetted.” 4<br />

Many believed the power the booksellers exercised over the spread<br />

of knowledge was harming that spread, just at the time the Enlightenment<br />

was teaching the importance of education and knowledge spread<br />

generally.The idea that knowledge should be free was a hallmark of the<br />

time, and these powerful commercial interests were interfering with<br />

that idea.<br />

To balance this power, Parliament decided to increase competition<br />

among booksellers, and the simplest way to do that was to spread the<br />

wealth of valuable books. Parliament therefore limited the term of<br />

copyrights, and thereby guaranteed that valuable books would become<br />

open to any publisher to publish after a limited time. Thus the setting<br />

of the term for existing works to just twenty-one years was a compromise<br />

to fight the power of the booksellers. The limitation on terms was<br />

an indirect way to assure competition among publishers, and thus the<br />

construction and spread of culture.<br />

When 1731 (1710 + 21) came along, however, the booksellers were<br />

getting anxious. They saw the consequences of more competition, and<br />

like every competitor, they didn’t like them. At first booksellers simply<br />

ignored the Statute of Anne, continuing to insist on the perpetual right<br />

to control publication. But in 1735 and 1737, they tried to persuade<br />

Parliament to extend their terms. Twenty-one years was not enough,<br />

they said; they needed more time.<br />

Parliament rejected their requests. As one pamphleteer put it, in<br />

words that echo today,<br />

I see no Reason for granting a further Term now, which will not<br />

hold as well for granting it again and again, as often as the Old<br />

“PROPERTY” 89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!