30.11.2012 Views

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

egistrations. Any real solution to the problem of formalities must address<br />

the real problem of governments standing at the core of any system<br />

of formalities. In this book, I offer such a solution. That solution<br />

essentially remakes the Copyright Office. For now, assume it was<br />

Amazon that ran the registration system. Assume it was one-click registration.<br />

The Eldred Act would propose a simple, one-click registration<br />

fifty years after a work was published. Based upon historical data,<br />

that system would move up to 98 percent of commercial work, commercial<br />

work that no longer had a commercial life, into the public domain<br />

within fifty years. What do you think?<br />

When Steve Forbes endorsed the idea, some in Washington began<br />

to pay attention. Many people contacted me pointing to representatives<br />

who might be willing to introduce the Eldred Act. And I had a few<br />

who directly suggested that they might be willing to take the first step.<br />

One representative, Zoe Lofgren of California, went so far as to get<br />

the bill drafted. The draft solved any problem with international law. It<br />

imposed the simplest requirement upon copyright owners possible. In<br />

May 2003, it looked as if the bill would be introduced. On May 16, I<br />

posted on the Eldred Act blog, “we are close.” There was a general reaction<br />

in the blog community that something good might happen here.<br />

But at this stage, the lobbyists began to intervene. Jack Valenti and<br />

the MPAA general counsel came to the congresswoman’s office to<br />

give the view of the MPAA. Aided by his lawyer, as Valenti told me,<br />

Valenti informed the congresswoman that the MPAA would oppose<br />

the Eldred Act.The reasons are embarrassingly thin. More importantly,<br />

their thinness shows something clear about what this debate is really<br />

about.<br />

The MPAA argued first that Congress had “firmly rejected the central<br />

concept in the proposed bill”—that copyrights be renewed. That<br />

was true, but irrelevant, as Congress’s “firm rejection” had occurred<br />

long before the Internet made subsequent uses much more likely. Sec-<br />

BALANCES 253

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!