30.11.2012 Views

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

download FREE CULTURE(PDF)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

this transition between twentieth-century models for doing business<br />

and twenty-first-century technologies.<br />

The answer begins with recognizing that there are different “problems”<br />

here to solve. Let’s start with type D content—uncopyrighted<br />

content or copyrighted content that the artist wants shared.The “problem”<br />

with this content is to make sure that the technology that would<br />

enable this kind of sharing is not rendered illegal. You can think of it<br />

this way: Pay phones are used to deliver ransom demands, no doubt.<br />

But there are many who need to use pay phones who have nothing to<br />

do with ransoms. It would be wrong to ban pay phones in order to<br />

eliminate kidnapping.<br />

Type C content raises a different “problem.” This is content that was,<br />

at one time, published and is no longer available. It may be unavailable<br />

because the artist is no longer valuable enough for the record label he<br />

signed with to carry his work. Or it may be unavailable because the work<br />

is forgotten. Either way, the aim of the law should be to facilitate the access<br />

to this content, ideally in a way that returns something to the artist.<br />

Again, the model here is the used book store. Once a book goes out<br />

of print, it may still be available in libraries and used book stores. But<br />

libraries and used book stores don’t pay the copyright owner when<br />

someone reads or buys an out-of-print book.That makes total sense, of<br />

course, since any other system would be so burdensome as to eliminate<br />

the possibility of used book stores’ existing. But from the author’s perspective,<br />

this “sharing” of his content without his being compensated is<br />

less than ideal.<br />

The model of used book stores suggests that the law could simply<br />

deem out-of-print music fair game. If the publisher does not make<br />

copies of the music available for sale, then commercial and noncommercial<br />

providers would be free, under this rule, to “share” that content,<br />

even though the sharing involved making a copy. The copy here would<br />

be incidental to the trade; in a context where commercial publishing<br />

has ended, trading music should be as free as trading books.<br />

AFTERWORD 299

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!