RDSO's report no. TFC-77 (January 2002) of the ... - eLocoS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Brief summary indicating extent of problem of stalling as reported by railway' is givenbe 10'11: -Central Railway has given position of freight train stalling cases as separatelyand electric traction, Brief summary division~wise is given below: -'IIfor dieseloDir;sr:1 Traction -Total of 33 cases of freight train stalling were reported on this division in one-year periodfrom Sept, 2000 to August 2001. 19 cases took place'in RTA-MUGA section (ruling(]radient 1 in 125), 5 cases took place in GUNA-PGA section (ruling gradient 1 in 200).80th WOM2 uno WOG2 locomotives were used.'Totul of 37 cases of freight trains stalling were reported on this division for one-yearperiod from Sept 2000 to August 2001. Break up is 10 cases in KNW-ET section (rulinggradient 1 in 150). 20 cases in ET-BPL section (ruling gradient 1 in 125) and 7 cases in. BIN-BPL section (ruling gradient 1 in 180). Single/multiple WAGS & WAG7 locomotiveswere used for hauling freight trains.Total of 86 cases of stalling 'were reportod on this division for one-year perioe' from Sept2000 to August 2001. Breakup of these cases is - 32 cases in KYN-LNL section (rulinggradient 1 in 37), 18 cases in CLA-TR section (ruling gradient 1 in 150), 17 cases tookplace in KYN-IGP section (ruling gradient 1 In 37). 10 cases in PNVL-NSPT section (rulinggradient 1 in 100). 9 cases in KYN-PNVL-ROHA section (ruling gradient 1 in 125).Bankers have been provided in all cases in KYN-LNL & I
Total of 22 cases of freight stalling were reponed on this division during Jan. 2001 toSept. 2001 - 11 cases in BZM-JHS section "(ruling gradient 1 in 200), 6 cases in BHDA-MKP section (ruling gradient 1 in 150) and 5 cases in BNDA-JHS section (ruling gradient1 in 125). Locomotives used were both WDG2 & WDM2.Total of 12 cases of freight train stalling were reported on this division in one-year periodfrom Sept 2000 to August 2001. All cases took place in JHS-AGC section (ruling gradient1 in 150). Both WAG5 & WAG? locomotives were used for hauling freight trains.18 cases of freight train stalling were reported on this division for one-year period fromSept. 2000 to August 2001. All these cases took place in NKJ-DMO section (rulinggradient 1 in 150). WAG5 & WAG? locomotives were used for hauling of th,ese trains.NagpurDivision:Total of 14? cases of freight train stalling were reported on this division for one-yearperiod from Sept. 2000 to August 2001. Breakup is - 49 cases in NGP-AMF section (rulinggradient 1 in 150), 35 cases in WR-NGP section (ruling gradient 1 in ·132), 26 cases inBD-WR section (ruling gradient 1 in 132), 1? cases in ET-AMF section (ruling gradient 1 in70) and 20 cases in BPQ-WR section (ruling gradient 1 in 150), Single/multiple WAGS &WAG? locomotives were used for hauling these trains.Total of 40 cases of frelight train stalling were reported on this division for the period April2001 to Sept.2001 (Total 6 months) -J 24 cases in SUR-DD section (ruling gradient 1 in150), 8 cases in MMR-DD section (ruling gradient 1 In 100), 6 cases in SUR-WD section(ruling gradient 1 in 100) and 2 cases In other sections. Single/multiple WDM2M/DG2locomotives have been used Jor hauling of Ult1tH~ trains.NorthernRailway:As per information furnished by NR only 18 cases of stalling have been reported (betweenMarch 2000-June 2001) on the section falling under Delhi division. In all other divisionsno stalling cases have been reported. Out of 18 cases reported in Delhi division, in tencasas banker was used for clearing the load. BG track under N.Rly. are mostlx plain.3
Page 5 and 6: . ,sma ~HCPZ:i' ~a--i:tzCl
Page 7 and 8: i) Improvement in enginemanship;ii)
Page 9 and 10: INDEX:S.NG. Desc'ript~oll Page No.1
Page 11: 1.0·Introduction:Adequate powering
Page 15 and 16: gradient of 1 in 37, two triple hea
Page 17 and 18: VI)' Running of 58 Box 'N' rake sho
Page 19 and 20: The "table above shows a substantia
Page 21 and 22: Similarly starting load for WDM2 mu
Page 23 and 24: GRADE 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 STARTLEV
Page 25 and 26: 0.3Coeffecientof Adhesion on Oily R
Page 27 and 28: 6.3.4.2 Length of the Gradient and
Page 29 and 30: 7.2.2 The restricfions for double-h
Page 31 and 32: plDced at Annexure No. VI. New sets
Page 33 and 34: q-~1~~JF.y~r, m- ~r~1.[
Page 35 and 36: I HL Y- . Di"jsion Total Period T f
Page 37 and 38: __ .' __ 0"_ 0.0.••• 0- __
Page 39 and 40: HAULAGE CHARTS FOR DIESEL LOCOS FOR
Page 41 and 42: ~ ___ • _0 ••••---_._ 0
Page 43 and 44: --_.- ._ ..._._ •.... .... .. ..
Page 45 and 46: S.NO.- --- -- --- ---_. --.--.-----
Page 47 and 48: APPROACH SPEED VS LENGTH OF MAXIMUM
Page 49 and 50: APPROACH SPEED VS LENGTH OF MAXIMUM
Page 51 and 52: •• • • # • • ."'"!=..
Page 53 and 54: ,110'~. •.;...~::.. "(.-:-:A~~ ,
Page 55 and 56: f:.~"L /\!. ~~~:~'!::}.~:;?,~_Gl~~l
Page 57 and 58: ;,1,tI I ,IiC;:.:'iJ1_-,- ---------

RDSO's report no. TFC-77 (January 2002) of the ... - eLocoS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?