12.07.2015 Views

v2007.11.26 - Convex Optimization

v2007.11.26 - Convex Optimization

v2007.11.26 - Convex Optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 203minimize tX∈ S M , t∈Rsubject to ‖A − X‖ 2 F ≤ tS T XS ≽ 0(485)Next we use Schur complement [206,6.4.3] [182] and matrix vectorization(2.2):minimize tX∈ S M , t∈R[]tI vec(A − X)subject tovec(A − X) T ≽ 0 (486)1S T XS ≽ 0This semidefinite program is an epigraph form in disguise, equivalentto (484); it demonstrates how a quadratic objective or constraint can beconverted to a semidefinite constraint.Were problem (484) instead equivalently expressed without the squarethen we get a subtle variation:that leads to an equivalent for (487)minimizeX∈ S M , t∈Rsubject tominimize ‖A − X‖ FX∈ S Msubject to S T XS ≽ 0minimize tX∈ S M , t∈Rsubject to ‖A − X‖ F ≤ tt[S T XS ≽ 0tI vec(A − X)vec(A − X) T tS T XS ≽ 0]≽ 0(487)(488)(489)3.1.7.2.1 Example. Schur anomaly.Consider a problem abstract in the convex constraint, given symmetricmatrix Aminimize ‖X‖ 2X∈ S M F − ‖A − X‖2 F(490)subject to X ∈ Cthe minimization of a difference of two quadratic functions each convex inmatrix X . Observe equality

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!