12.07.2015 Views

Master's Thesis in Theoretical Physics - Universiteit Utrecht

Master's Thesis in Theoretical Physics - Universiteit Utrecht

Master's Thesis in Theoretical Physics - Universiteit Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

horizon dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>flation isl phys (t) = 1 H 0(e H 0t − 1). (3.5)Thus, the particle horizon <strong>in</strong>creases exponentially with time. The Hubble radius howeveris constant dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>flation (s<strong>in</strong>ce H = ȧ/a = H 0 is constant) and is equal to R H = 1/H 0 .So we conclude that dur<strong>in</strong>g de Sitter <strong>in</strong>flation the particle horizon grows exponentially withrespect to the Hubble radius. If this happens the particle horizon can grow to many orders ofmagnitude beyond the Hubble radius. So particles that cannot communicate now, becausetheir separation distance is much larger than R H , were able to communicate <strong>in</strong> the pastbecause the particle horizon is much larger than the distance between the particles. Thissolves the horizon puzzle.The flatness puzzle is solved by <strong>in</strong>flation as well. The FLRW equations can also be derivedfor the FLRW metric with k ≠ 0 from Eq. (2.4). This changes the first of the FLRW equationstoH 2 = 8πG Nρ − k 3 a 2 , (3.6)which we can rewrite as1 = ρ −kρ crit H 2 a 2 ≡ Ω total − Ω k , (3.7)where the critical energy density, the density necessary for a flat universe with k = 0, isdef<strong>in</strong>ed asρ crit = 3H2 t8πG N. (3.8)H t is the Hubble parameter today and is approximately 73±3 kms −1 Mpc −1 . Measurementsof the energy density of the universe giveΩ k =kH 2 = 0.01 ± 0.02, (3.9)a2 so the energy density <strong>in</strong> our universe is at this moment very close to the critical density.Now we want to f<strong>in</strong>d how the magnitude of the curvature term <strong>in</strong> Eq. (3.7) at earlier times.By aga<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g Table 2.1, we f<strong>in</strong>d that dur<strong>in</strong>g matter era Ha ∝ t − 1 3 and dur<strong>in</strong>g radiationera Ha ∝ t − 1 2 . S<strong>in</strong>ce k is constant, we conclude that the curvature term k 2 /(Ha) 2 was muchsmaller <strong>in</strong> the early universe. This means that if we live <strong>in</strong> a universe with some k ≠ 0,the energy density <strong>in</strong> the early universe must have been extremely f<strong>in</strong>e tuned close to thecritical density. Although a f<strong>in</strong>e tun<strong>in</strong>g problem is not a problem per se, it is highly unlikelythat the energy density of the universe was so extremely close to the critical density suchthat we now measure a curvature term which is close to zero.Inflation solves this puzzle by not<strong>in</strong>g that dur<strong>in</strong>g (de Sitter) <strong>in</strong>flation the factor Ha ∝ e H0t .The curvature term now scales as k/(Ha) 2 ∝ e −2H0t , so at earlier times this term was muchbigger. This also means that the energy density could have been far from the critical densityand we do not have a f<strong>in</strong>e tun<strong>in</strong>g problem. A useful quantity to def<strong>in</strong>e now is the number ofe-folds N(t),( ) ∫ a(t) tN(t) = ln = H(t ′ )dt ′ , (3.10)a iwhere a i ≡ a(t = 0). In one e-fold the scale factor has <strong>in</strong>creased by a factor e, which <strong>in</strong>the case of de Sitter <strong>in</strong>flation happens when t = 1/H 0 . The flatness puzzle is solved whenΩ k ≃ 1 at some early time (before <strong>in</strong>flation), and one can calculate that the number of e-foldsnecessary for this is N(t) ≃ 70. This solves the flatness puzzle.F<strong>in</strong>ally, the cosmic relics puzzle is solved by <strong>in</strong>flation. The solution is comparable to the0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!