12.07.2015 Views

Master's Thesis in Theoretical Physics - Universiteit Utrecht

Master's Thesis in Theoretical Physics - Universiteit Utrecht

Master's Thesis in Theoretical Physics - Universiteit Utrecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This term is precisely the derivative of θ times the zeroth component of the axial vectorcurrent J 5µ ,J 5µ = χγ µ γ 5 χ = χ L γ µ χ L − χ R γ µ χ R . (6.57)This term explicitly violates C and CP (it is odd under CP). If we now derive the field equationsfrom the fermion action with the additional term (6.56), we f<strong>in</strong>d the field equationswhere the mass m = f |φ| and whereiχ ′ L,h + h ˜k h χ L,h − amχ R,h = 0iχ ′ R,h − h ˜k h χ R,h − amχ L,h = 0, (6.58)˜k h = k − h ˙θ2 . (6.59)If ˙θ is constant, we f<strong>in</strong>d that we have obta<strong>in</strong>ed the field equations (6.48) with the differencethat the mass is now real and the momentum k is shifted by ˙θ. These are precisely the fieldequations that are solved by Koksma and Prokopec <strong>in</strong> [38]. We can therefore simply copytheir results and replace all the momenta k by ˜k. In calculat<strong>in</strong>g the propagator one has to<strong>in</strong>sert the solutions <strong>in</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition of the propagator Eq. (6.39). Roughly this means onehas to <strong>in</strong>tegrate the mode functions χ(k,η) over the momenta k, analogous to the calculationof the scalar propagator <strong>in</strong> Eq. (5.92). We can write this as an <strong>in</strong>tegration over k, butremember that the Hankel functions are functions of ˜k. One can then try to solve this byshift<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tegration variable k to ˜k, which means we have to do an extra <strong>in</strong>tegrationover the mode functions from −h ˙θ˙θ2to 0. Another way to solve this is by consider<strong>in</strong>g the h2as a small parameter, such that we can write ˜k = k + δk and do a Taylor expansion for δksmall.The study on the calculation of the massive fermion propagator with a shifted momentum˜k was only started towards the end of this thesis. Therefore we cannot present any rigorousresults here, but only give an outl<strong>in</strong>e for further study. We hope that the shifted momentumwill give an extra term <strong>in</strong> the propagator that is similar to the axial vector current and isCP violat<strong>in</strong>g. This axial vector current can then be converted by sphaleron processes <strong>in</strong>toa baryon asymmetry and could source baryogenesis. If this is the case, then the two-Higgsdoublet model would not only be a good model for <strong>in</strong>flation, but could also be used to expla<strong>in</strong>the baryon asymmetry of the universe. We hope to do a rigorous study on the fermionpropagator <strong>in</strong> future work.This concludes our study on the massive fermion propagator derived from a fermion actionwhere the mass is generated by a complex scalar field. The calculations <strong>in</strong> this sectionwhere all focused on solv<strong>in</strong>g the Dirac equation for the fermion fields at tree-level. In otherwords, we tried to calculate the fermion propagator, but did not yet <strong>in</strong>clude any loop effects.In the next section we will <strong>in</strong> fact calculate the one-loop fermion self-energy.6.3 One-loop fermion self-energyIn quantum field theory, an <strong>in</strong>teraction is seen as a small perturbation to the quadratic partof the action. By expand<strong>in</strong>g the path <strong>in</strong>tegral <strong>in</strong> terms of the small perturbation, one canderive the Feynman rules and Feynman diagrams for the <strong>in</strong>teractions. Instead of tak<strong>in</strong>gonly the "classical" tree-level propagator, the quantum propagator is constructed by tak<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>to account all loop corrections of arbitrary order. S<strong>in</strong>ce each loop is proportional to afactor ħ, the biggest loop contribution to the propagator will be the one-loop effect. In Fig.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!