Figure 47: Decision Tree for Different Antenna Schemes 116The simplest mode is AC2, which is referred <strong>to</strong> as Transmit Diversity (TD) or sometimesSpace Frequency Block Code (SFBC) or even Open Loop Transmit Diversity. TD can besupported under all conditions, meaning it can operate under low SINR, high mobility,and low channel rank (rank = 1). This rank means that the channel is not sufficientlyscattered or de-correlated <strong>to</strong> support two spatial streams. Thus, in TD, only one spatialstream or what is sometimes referred as a single codeword (SCW) is transmitted. If thechannel rank increases <strong>to</strong> a value of two, indicating a more scattered channel, and theSINR is a bit higher, then the system can adapt <strong>to</strong> AC3 or Open-Loop Spatial Multiplexing(OL-SM), which is also referred <strong>to</strong> as large-delay Cyclic Delay Diversity (CDD). This modesupports two spatial streams or two codewords. This mode, also referred <strong>to</strong> as multiplecodeword (MCW) operation, increases throughput over SCW transmission.If the rank of the channel is one, but the device is not moving very fast or is stationary,then the system can adapt <strong>to</strong> AC6, called closed-loop (CL) precoding (or CL-rank 1 or CL-R1). In this mode, feedback is provided by the device in terms of Precoding MatrixIndication (PMI) bits. These tell the base station what precoding matrix <strong>to</strong> use in thetransmitter so as <strong>to</strong> optimize link performance. This feedback is only relevant for lowmobilityor stationary conditions since in high mobility conditions the feedback will mostlikely be outdated by the time it can be used by the base station.Another mode is AC4 or Closed Loop Spatial Multiplexing (CL-SM), which is enabled forlow mobility, high SINR, and channel rank of two. This mode theoretically provides thebest user throughput. The figure above shows how these modes can adapt downwards <strong>to</strong>either OL TD, or if in CL-SM mode, down <strong>to</strong> either OL TD or CL R1.For a 4x4 MIMO configuration, the channel rank can take on values of three and four inaddition <strong>to</strong> one or two. Initial deployment at the base station, however, will likely be two116 Source: 3G <strong>Americas</strong>’ white paper “MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and <strong>4G</strong> Wireless Systems –Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations,” May 2010.Transition <strong>to</strong> <strong>4G</strong>: <strong>3GPP</strong> <strong>Broadband</strong> <strong>Evolution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>IMT</strong>-<strong>Advanced</strong>, Rysavy Research/3G <strong>Americas</strong>, Aug 2010 Page 104
TX antennas and most devices will only have 2 RX antennas, and thus the rank is limited<strong>to</strong> 2.AC5 is MU-MIMO, which is not defined for the downlink in Release 8.AC1 and AC7 are single antenna port modes in which AC1 uses a common ReferenceSignal (RS), while AC7 uses a dedicated RS or what is also called a user specific RS. AC1implies a single TX antenna at the base station. AC7 implies an antenna array withantennal elements closely spaced so that a physical or spatial beam can be formed<strong>to</strong>wards an intended user.LTE is specified for a variety of MIMO configurations. On the downlink, these include 2X2,4X2 (four antennas at the base station), and 4X4. Initial deployment will likely be 2x2.4X4 will be most likely used initially in fem<strong>to</strong>cells. On the uplink, there are two possibleapproaches: single-user MIMO (SU-MIMO) and multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO). SU-MIMO ismore complex <strong>to</strong> implement as it requires two parallel radio transmit chains in the mobiledevice, whereas MU-MIMO does not require any additional implementation at the device.The first LTE release thus incorporates MU-MIMO with SU-MIMO deferred for the secondLTE release.Peak data rates are approximately proportional <strong>to</strong> the number of send and receiveantennas. 4X4 MIMO is thus theoretically capable of twice the data rate of a 2X2 MIMOsystem. The spatial-multiplexing MIMO modes that support the highest throughput rateswill be available in early deployments.For a more detailed discussion of <strong>3GPP</strong> antenna technologies, refer <strong>to</strong> the 3G <strong>Americas</strong>’white paper “MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and <strong>4G</strong> Wireless Systems – PracticalAspects and Deployment Considerations,” May 2010.Channel BandwidthsLTE is designed <strong>to</strong> operate in channel bandwidths from 1.4 MHz <strong>to</strong> 20 MHz. The greatestefficiency, however, occurs with higher bandwidth. A 3G <strong>Americas</strong>’ member analysispredicts 40% lower spectral efficiency with 1.4 MHz radio channels and 13% lowerefficiency with 3 MHz channels. 117 The system, however, achieves nearly all of itsefficiency with 5 MHz channels or wider.IPv4/IPv6Release 8 defines support for IPv6 for both LTE and UMTS networks. An Evolved PacketSystem bearer can carry both IPv4 and IPv6 traffic. This enables a UE <strong>to</strong> communicateboth IPv4 and IPv6 packets (assuming it has a dual stack) while connected through asingle EPS bearer. It is up <strong>to</strong> the opera<strong>to</strong>r, however, whether it assigns IPv4, IPv6, orboth types of addresses <strong>to</strong> UE.Communicating between IPv6-only devices and IPv4 end-points will require pro<strong>to</strong>colconversionor proxies. For further details, refer <strong>to</strong> the 3G <strong>Americas</strong>’ white paper, “IPv6 –Transition Considerations for LTE and Evolved Packet Core,” February 2009.Voice SupportVoice support in LTE will range from no voice, <strong>to</strong> voice implemented in a circuit-switchedfallback (CSFB) mode <strong>to</strong> 2G or 3G, <strong>to</strong> voice implemented over LTE using IMS.As a pure data service, especially for lap<strong>to</strong>ps, voice may not be needed. But onceavailable on handheld devices, voice will become important. The easiest implementationwill be CSFB. In CSFB, the LTE network carries circuit-switched signaling over LTE117 3G <strong>Americas</strong>’ member company analysis 2009.Transition <strong>to</strong> <strong>4G</strong>: <strong>3GPP</strong> <strong>Broadband</strong> <strong>Evolution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>IMT</strong>-<strong>Advanced</strong>, Rysavy Research/3G <strong>Americas</strong>, Aug 2010 Page 105
- Page 11 and 12:
Quality of service (QoS). By priori
- Page 13:
Figure 4: WCDMA-HSPA Voice and Data
- Page 16 and 17:
It is clear that both EDGE and UMTS
- Page 18:
TechnologyNameType Characteristics
- Page 21 and 22:
Europe are providing operators with
- Page 23 and 24:
MHz, in Japan at 1500 MHz and in Eu
- Page 25 and 26:
and VoIP operation. These approache
- Page 27 and 28:
will be able to build applications
- Page 29 and 30:
Leveraging this success, operators
- Page 31 and 32:
VoIP for HSPA. Since LTE uses an IP
- Page 33 and 34:
Figure 10: Different Deployment Sce
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 11: Radio Resource Managemen
- Page 37 and 38:
IEEE 802.16e-2005 and now IEEE 802.
- Page 39 and 40:
attempts, no terrestrial wireless-d
- Page 41 and 42:
DownlinkPeakNetworkSpeedPeakand/orT
- Page 43 and 44:
DownlinkUplinkPeakNetworkSpeedPeaka
- Page 45 and 46:
Figure 13: HSDPA Performance of a 7
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 15: HSPA+ Performance Measur
- Page 49 and 50:
Figure 17: LTE Throughput in Variou
- Page 51 and 52:
Figure 19: Latency of Different Tec
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 20: Performance Relative to
- Page 55 and 56: Figure 21: Comparison of Downlink S
- Page 57 and 58: Incremental redundancy in error cor
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 23: Comparison of Voice Spec
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 24: Relative Volume of Subsc
- Page 63 and 64: Technology EDGE/HSPA/LTE CDMA2000 W
- Page 65 and 66: capacity of OFDMA-based approaches
- Page 67 and 68: In this section, we consider differ
- Page 69 and 70: To understand the evolution of data
- Page 71 and 72: how EDGE functions including networ
- Page 73 and 74: Alternatively, the original number
- Page 75 and 76: In today’s EDGE systems, f12 thro
- Page 77 and 78: DAS-9 16 QAM 217.6DAS-10 32 QAM 262
- Page 79 and 80: Operators can also use their entire
- Page 81 and 82: HSDPAHSPA refers to networks that s
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 33: User DiversitySignal Qua
- Page 85 and 86: Initial devices enabled peak user r
- Page 87 and 88: “single-stream MIMO” or “MIMO
- Page 89 and 90: Given the large amount of backhaul
- Page 91 and 92: connection between the network and
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 39: HSPA One-Tunnel Architec
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 40: High-Speed Forward Acces
- Page 97 and 98: elatively straightforward changes i
- Page 99 and 100: on LTE began in 2004 with an offici
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 45: LTE OFDMA Downlink Resou
- Page 103: Single base-station antenna versus
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 48: Evolution of Voice in an
- Page 109 and 110: Table 19: IMT-Advanced Requirements
- Page 111 and 112: Beyond wider bandwidths, LTE-Advanc
- Page 113 and 114: As discussed in more detail in the
- Page 115 and 116: Different technologies spanning Wi-
- Page 117 and 118: stations, and because of the narrow
- Page 119 and 120: Support for new radio-access networ
- Page 121 and 122: AbbreviationsThe following abbrevia
- Page 123 and 124: GBR - Guaranteed Bit RateGbyte - Gi
- Page 125 and 126: PHY - Physical LayerPMI - Precoding
- Page 127 and 128: Additional Information3G Americas m
- Page 129 and 130: Ericsson: HSPA voice migration, Jun
- Page 131 and 132: SNL Kagan: press release, “SNL Ka