List, <strong>in</strong> Ozorków Women of Tomorrow, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Szemudy local district the Equal Opportunityelection committee. Some of these consisted exclusively of women; others also <strong>in</strong>cluded men onthe c<strong>and</strong>idate lists. In some local districts women from these committees were elected, but never <strong>in</strong>any great number.Observations about the exclusion of women from politics <strong>and</strong> the need to <strong>in</strong>crease women’srepresentation were the basis on which the Women’s Party (Partia Kobiet) was founded. Itpresented c<strong>and</strong>idates for election <strong>in</strong> a number of electoral districts <strong>in</strong> the 2007 election. The party,which was founded by a famous female writer, was able to br<strong>in</strong>g together well-known women whosupported it as well as many women who used to be active <strong>in</strong> smaller communities but lost theopportunity to work locally on women’s issues when the right-w<strong>in</strong>g government took power <strong>in</strong>2005 45 . Unfortunately such <strong>in</strong>itiatives have very little chance of ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g significant support <strong>and</strong> trulyenter<strong>in</strong>g the political scene 46 . The current system of political party f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g means that new partieshave practically no chance to establish themselves. This applies not only to the Women’s Party butalso, for example, to the Green Party.However, the presence of the Women’s Party <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> electoral districts raised the overallpercentage of women on the electoral lists: women amounted to 97 per cent of c<strong>and</strong>idates on theWomen’s Party lists.3.2. The presentation of men <strong>and</strong> women c<strong>and</strong>idates <strong>in</strong> electoral campaignsOne of the most popular forms of presentation of c<strong>and</strong>idates <strong>and</strong> programmes dur<strong>in</strong>g the electioncampaign is television election shows. Analysis of shows prepared by the parties for Channel 1 ofpublic television with<strong>in</strong> <strong>their</strong> free TV air time before elections <strong>in</strong> 1993, 1997 <strong>and</strong> 2001 <strong>in</strong>dicates thatthe TV election campaign was ‘male’ – political parties promoted men, <strong>and</strong> devoted almost all <strong>their</strong>free air time to <strong>their</strong> statements. The vast majority of parties devoted less than 10 per cent of <strong>their</strong>time to women’s statements <strong>and</strong> more than 90 per cent of <strong>their</strong> time to men’s statements (Fuszara2006).3.3. Public op<strong>in</strong>ion on <strong>gender</strong> equality <strong>in</strong> politicsPublic op<strong>in</strong>ion polls show that the protest aga<strong>in</strong>st the low participation of women <strong>in</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>gbodies is expressed, <strong>in</strong> the first place, by women, although there is an <strong>in</strong>crease of men who th<strong>in</strong>kthat women’s participation <strong>in</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g bodies is too low 47 . Society notices <strong>in</strong>equality ofopportunities: a large majority of respondents (74 per cent) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> that women have lessopportunity to succeed <strong>in</strong> a political career than men. This op<strong>in</strong>ion is presented a little more oftenby women (78 per cent) than by men (70 per cent). The percentage of women who feel that womenhave fewer opportunities has <strong>in</strong>creased considerably: <strong>in</strong> 1993 48 , 64 per cent of female respondentsfelt certa<strong>in</strong> about this, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2000 78 per cent of women thought that women have fewer chances.Public op<strong>in</strong>ion polls <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong> also show that an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of people th<strong>in</strong>k that thereshould be more women <strong>in</strong> the public sphere. In 2004, 54 per cent of respondents thought thereshould be more women <strong>in</strong> government, 53 per cent that there should be more <strong>in</strong> the Parliament,<strong>and</strong> 53 per cent that there should be more <strong>in</strong> local government 49 . Op<strong>in</strong>ions on this issue are closelycorrelated with the <strong>gender</strong> of the respondents. All public op<strong>in</strong>ion research shows that it is muchmore often women than men who want an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> women’s participation <strong>in</strong> power (<strong>in</strong>45 Before the 2005 elections offices for <strong>gender</strong> equality were created on both the national <strong>and</strong> regional (województwo) levels. Afterthe 2005 elections these offices were dissolved.46 In elections <strong>in</strong> 2007 the Women’s Party did not pass the 5 per cent threshold for political parties.47 Research conducted <strong>in</strong> 2000, representative sample of 1,010 adult Poles.48 The sample <strong>in</strong> research conducted <strong>in</strong> 1993 <strong>in</strong>cluded only women.49 Research conducted <strong>in</strong> 2004, a representative sample of 1,002 adult Poles.78
Parliament, government, local government, the courts, <strong>and</strong> high positions <strong>in</strong> public adm<strong>in</strong>istration).There is also a clear connection between op<strong>in</strong>ions on women’s participation <strong>in</strong> power <strong>and</strong> level ofeducation: the higher the level of education, the higher the percentage of respondents who are ofthe op<strong>in</strong>ion that there should be more women <strong>in</strong> power than there are now.Answers to the question whether there is a need for a greater share of women <strong>in</strong> power do not yetclarify what level of representation is regarded by respondents as appropriate. In 2000 the largestproportion of respondents believed that women should constitute half or more of the membershipof the Sejm <strong>and</strong> Senat (42 per cent), of government (40 per cent), of the public adm<strong>in</strong>istration(47 per cent) <strong>and</strong> of local authorities (50 per cent). These op<strong>in</strong>ions are also related to the <strong>gender</strong> ofthe respondents: far more women than men favour a considerable share for women <strong>in</strong> publicauthorities. Men more often than women th<strong>in</strong>k that that the <strong>gender</strong> of persons <strong>in</strong> positions ofauthority is <strong>in</strong>significant, <strong>and</strong> more often opt for low participation by women 50 (Fuszara 2006).The respondents listed the follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons for women’s lower participation <strong>in</strong> politics 51 .1. The reason most often cited, given by 30 per cent of respondents, was the burden of duties <strong>in</strong>the private sphere – motherhood, family responsibilities, housework, responsibility for others,<strong>and</strong> the potential conflict between these duties <strong>and</strong> activity <strong>in</strong> the public sphere.2. Twenty-three per cent of respondents mentioned discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> the barriers placed <strong>in</strong>front of the women by men – favour<strong>in</strong>g men, fear of competition from women, <strong>and</strong> malechauv<strong>in</strong>ism.3. Thirteen per cent of respondents mentioned tradition, custom <strong>and</strong> stereotype, for example,‘men had power for many many years’, ‘it is generally believed that power is held by men’ <strong>and</strong> soon.4. Ten per cent of respondents mentioned women’s unwill<strong>in</strong>gness to take on such roles, <strong>and</strong> alack of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved.5. Six per cent of respondents spoke of qualities of women such as gentleness, submissiveness,<strong>and</strong> lack of ability to fight for themselves 52 .Other reasons that were also mentioned <strong>in</strong>cluded, <strong>in</strong>ter alia, women be<strong>in</strong>g undervalued 53 , thatwomen lack the political connections which make it possible to succeed, <strong>and</strong> the decisions of theelectorate.Twice, <strong>in</strong> 1999 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2004, respondents were asked about guarantee<strong>in</strong>g women a certa<strong>in</strong> numberof positions on c<strong>and</strong>idate lists <strong>in</strong> an election. In both studies the majority of respondents said thatthe idea was good (63 per cent <strong>in</strong> 1999, <strong>and</strong> 53 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2004), <strong>and</strong> just over a quarter of therespondents said it was bad (27 per cent <strong>in</strong> 1999, <strong>and</strong> 28 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2004). While the number ofrespondents who support this solution fell between 1999 <strong>and</strong> 2004, the number of opponents ofthe solution rema<strong>in</strong>ed quite steady, while the proportion of respondents who were undecided<strong>in</strong>creased (from 10 per cent <strong>in</strong> 1999 to 19 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2004). The year 1999 saw many debates onthe law on equal status of men <strong>and</strong> women, <strong>and</strong> there was also a great deal of discussion of the<strong>in</strong>troduction of quota <strong>systems</strong> to political parties. This probably accounts for respondents’ greatercerta<strong>in</strong>ty as to <strong>their</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ions on this matter <strong>in</strong> 1999.50 Men more often than women expressed the op<strong>in</strong>ion that women should constitute less than 25 per cent or even less than 10 percent of the membership of the Parliament, the government, local governments <strong>and</strong> high positions <strong>in</strong> public adm<strong>in</strong>istration.51 An open-ended question.52 The percentages do not add up to 100 s<strong>in</strong>ce some respondents gave no reasons while others gave more than one reason.53 Some respondents used this very general expression, without any explanation as to by whom women are undervalued.79
- Page 3 and 4:
Directorate-General Internal Polici
- Page 5 and 6:
Electoral Gender Quota Systems andT
- Page 8 and 9:
AppendicesThe methodology of the qu
- Page 10 and 11:
Table 41. Women’s representation
- Page 12 and 13:
1. Mapping of electoral gender quot
- Page 14 and 15:
Committee of Ministers’ Recommend
- Page 16 and 17:
have occurred after election day -
- Page 18 and 19:
parties and take the form of intern
- Page 20 and 21:
Knowledge of different electoral qu
- Page 22 and 23:
support for female candidates has s
- Page 24 and 25:
of more women in politics. Many opp
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure 3. The incremental track mod
- Page 28 and 29:
is probably that gender quotas rema
- Page 30 and 31:
to gender quotas. Likewise, the dat
- Page 32 and 33: ‘Special organisation for women w
- Page 34 and 35: individual parties that adopt them,
- Page 36 and 37: political party in the Swedish Parl
- Page 38 and 39: then the requirement of 50 per cent
- Page 40 and 41: proportion of women elected in the
- Page 42 and 43: and organisation of women are cruci
- Page 44 and 45: Matland, Richard E., ‘Enhancing W
- Page 46 and 47: Case studyBelgium: a best practice
- Page 48 and 49: While the 1994 act applied to all e
- Page 50 and 51: need to include at least one woman,
- Page 52 and 53: introduced, individual parties adop
- Page 54 and 55: Marissal, Claudie and Hansen, Ingri
- Page 56 and 57: In order to correct the discriminat
- Page 58 and 59: The legal vacuum pertaining to the
- Page 60 and 61: y women in terms of number of seats
- Page 62 and 63: 5. ‘Virtuous dynamic’: the symb
- Page 64 and 65: Case studyGermany: successful quota
- Page 66 and 67: party positions (Gruppenwahlen zu P
- Page 68 and 69: districts, quota rules are often no
- Page 70 and 71: Table 14. Success rates of female a
- Page 72 and 73: Figure 5. Development of the percen
- Page 74 and 75: so far no formal rules have been ad
- Page 76 and 77: Case studyPoland: one step forward,
- Page 78 and 79: 16 in Poland)Rady powiatów(second
- Page 80 and 81: 3. Evaluation3.1. Candidate lists i
- Page 84 and 85: 3.4. Representation of women in oth
- Page 86 and 87: Case studySlovenia: from voluntary
- Page 88 and 89: council. The positions of candidate
- Page 90 and 91: 3.2.2. The introduction of legislat
- Page 92 and 93: Table 25 shows that only one of the
- Page 94 and 95: Source: Author’s own calculation
- Page 96 and 97: Zakon o volitvah v Evropski parlame
- Page 98 and 99: Advocates for quotas for women lobb
- Page 100 and 101: Table 31. The percentage and number
- Page 102 and 103: Table 33. Municipality elections in
- Page 104 and 105: Case studySweden: small steps, big
- Page 106 and 107: 40 per cent of either sex on the pa
- Page 108 and 109: voluntary party quotas than in part
- Page 110 and 111: The zipper system (50 per cent) int
- Page 112 and 113: While quotas for minority groups ha
- Page 114 and 115: Case studyThe United Kingdom: polit
- Page 116 and 117: In contrast to Labour, the Scottish
- Page 118 and 119: The twinning and zipping policies a
- Page 120 and 121: differences across the political pa
- Page 122 and 123: Appendix IThe methodology of the qu
- Page 124 and 125: Brigitte Geissel is a political sci
- Page 126: ZLSDZZPUnited List of Social Democr