3.4. Representation of women <strong>in</strong> other bodiesIn Pol<strong>and</strong> there is no legal mechanism which would make it obligatory to work towards ensur<strong>in</strong>gequal participation of men <strong>and</strong> women <strong>in</strong> power. However, a slow process is observable wherebythis has been transformed <strong>in</strong>to a political issue. For many years, both before 1989 <strong>and</strong> after thetransformation, either there were no women <strong>in</strong> government or there was one token woman. Forthe first time women held five m<strong>in</strong>isterial positions <strong>in</strong> Jerzy Buzek’s government (1997–2001), <strong>and</strong>then <strong>in</strong> Jarosław Kaczyński’s government (2006–7). There is the same number of women (five) <strong>in</strong>m<strong>in</strong>isterial positions <strong>in</strong> the current government of Donald Tusk, which has been <strong>in</strong> power s<strong>in</strong>ce2007 (they currently make up 28 per cent of government m<strong>in</strong>isters).The situation is similar <strong>in</strong> local authorities. Until a short time ago, there was no woman wojewoda(head of one of the 16 regions 54 ). Now four women hold this position (mak<strong>in</strong>g up 25 per cent ofthe total).4. Conclusions1. Quota <strong>systems</strong>, even those that are very limited <strong>in</strong> scope, contribute to enforc<strong>in</strong>g equalopportunities for women <strong>and</strong> men.2. When quota <strong>systems</strong> are not backed by sanctions, they often fail to be observed even if theyhave been <strong>in</strong>troduced by the parties voluntarily. This may be because these provisions are oftenadopted by parties immediately before elections, under pressure from women who are notpowerful enough <strong>and</strong> whose political participation is not strong enough for them to be able toforce the parties to observe the regulation with<strong>in</strong> a time frame beyond the immediate election.3. An argument often used by opponents of quota <strong>systems</strong> is the fear that <strong>in</strong>dividuals who arenot competent will be appo<strong>in</strong>ted to positions of power if such <strong>systems</strong> are <strong>in</strong>troduced.However, research shows that the opposite mechanism operates <strong>in</strong> politics: competent womenare held away from power <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence by men. This may lead to the deduction that the fear ofcompetition from competent women is one of the most important, but at the same time mostcarefully masked, reasons for the opposition to a quota system. Moreover, <strong>in</strong>stead of search<strong>in</strong>gfor women who are competent, the parties seek out women who have no political experience,who pose no threat to <strong>in</strong>cumbent leaders, <strong>and</strong> who at the same time serve as evidence thatwomen are <strong>in</strong>experienced, ‘new’ <strong>and</strong> not knowledgeable about politics.4. The Polish experience shows that if at least one party <strong>in</strong>troduces a system of enforc<strong>in</strong>g equalopportunities for men <strong>and</strong> women, other parties attempt to demonstrate that they too arefamiliar with the issue of equal opportunities <strong>and</strong> the under-representation of women, forexample by appo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g more women at government level, or by plac<strong>in</strong>g more women on highpositions on electoral lists. Thus, even if to a limited extent, the position <strong>and</strong> opportunities ofwomen are be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased across the spectrum of political parties.References <strong>and</strong> further read<strong>in</strong>gFuszara, Małgorzata, ‘New Gender Relations <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1990s’, <strong>in</strong> G. Kligman <strong>and</strong> S. Gal (eds),Reproduc<strong>in</strong>g Gender: Politics, Publics, <strong>and</strong> Everyday Life after Socialism (Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton, NJ: Pr<strong>in</strong>cetonUniversity Press, 2000), pp. 259–85Fuszara, Małgorzata, ‘Kobiety w Polsce na przełomie wieków: Nowy kontrakt płci?’ [Women <strong>in</strong>Pol<strong>and</strong> at the turn of the century: a new <strong>gender</strong> contract?]’, <strong>in</strong> M. Fuszara (ed.) (Warsaw:Instytut Spraw Publicznych Warszawa, 2002)54 Pol<strong>and</strong> is divided <strong>in</strong>to 16 adm<strong>in</strong>istrative districts (województwo), each headed by an official (wojewoda) appo<strong>in</strong>ted by the primem<strong>in</strong>ister.80
Fuszara, Małgorzata, ‘Between Fem<strong>in</strong>ism <strong>and</strong> the Catholic Church: The Women’s Movement <strong>in</strong>Pol<strong>and</strong>’, Czech Sociological Review, 5 (2005), pp. 1057–75Fuszara, Małgorzata, Kobiety w polityce [Women <strong>in</strong> politics] (Warsaw: TRIO, 2006)Fuszara, Małgorzata <strong>and</strong> Zielińska, Eleonora, ‘Women <strong>and</strong> the Law <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>: Towards ActiveCitizenship’, <strong>in</strong> J. Lukic, J. Regulska <strong>and</strong> D. Zavirsek (eds), Women <strong>and</strong> Citizenship <strong>in</strong> Central <strong>and</strong>Eastern <strong>Europe</strong> (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006) pp. 39–60Kurczewski, Jacek, Posłowie a op<strong>in</strong>ia publiczna [Deputies <strong>and</strong> public op<strong>in</strong>ion] (Warsaw: ISNS, 1999)Siemieńska, Renata, Nie mogą? Nie chcą? Nie potrafią? O postawach i uczestnictwie politycznym kobiet wPolsce [They do not want, they are unable, do they? About attitudes <strong>and</strong> women’s politicalparticipation <strong>in</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>] (Warsaw: Scholar, 2000)Siemieńska, Renata, Płeć, wybory władza [Gender, elections, power] (Warsaw: Scholar, 2005)Spurek, Sylwia, Kobiety, partie, wybory [Women, parties, elections] (Łódź: CPK, 2002)Titkow, Anna (ed.), Szklany sufit: Bariery i ograniczenia karier kobiet [Glass ceil<strong>in</strong>g: barriers <strong>and</strong>obstacles <strong>in</strong> the careers of women] (Warsaw: ISP, 2003)81
- Page 3 and 4:
Directorate-General Internal Polici
- Page 5 and 6:
Electoral Gender Quota Systems andT
- Page 8 and 9:
AppendicesThe methodology of the qu
- Page 10 and 11:
Table 41. Women’s representation
- Page 12 and 13:
1. Mapping of electoral gender quot
- Page 14 and 15:
Committee of Ministers’ Recommend
- Page 16 and 17:
have occurred after election day -
- Page 18 and 19:
parties and take the form of intern
- Page 20 and 21:
Knowledge of different electoral qu
- Page 22 and 23:
support for female candidates has s
- Page 24 and 25:
of more women in politics. Many opp
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure 3. The incremental track mod
- Page 28 and 29:
is probably that gender quotas rema
- Page 30 and 31:
to gender quotas. Likewise, the dat
- Page 32 and 33:
‘Special organisation for women w
- Page 34 and 35: individual parties that adopt them,
- Page 36 and 37: political party in the Swedish Parl
- Page 38 and 39: then the requirement of 50 per cent
- Page 40 and 41: proportion of women elected in the
- Page 42 and 43: and organisation of women are cruci
- Page 44 and 45: Matland, Richard E., ‘Enhancing W
- Page 46 and 47: Case studyBelgium: a best practice
- Page 48 and 49: While the 1994 act applied to all e
- Page 50 and 51: need to include at least one woman,
- Page 52 and 53: introduced, individual parties adop
- Page 54 and 55: Marissal, Claudie and Hansen, Ingri
- Page 56 and 57: In order to correct the discriminat
- Page 58 and 59: The legal vacuum pertaining to the
- Page 60 and 61: y women in terms of number of seats
- Page 62 and 63: 5. ‘Virtuous dynamic’: the symb
- Page 64 and 65: Case studyGermany: successful quota
- Page 66 and 67: party positions (Gruppenwahlen zu P
- Page 68 and 69: districts, quota rules are often no
- Page 70 and 71: Table 14. Success rates of female a
- Page 72 and 73: Figure 5. Development of the percen
- Page 74 and 75: so far no formal rules have been ad
- Page 76 and 77: Case studyPoland: one step forward,
- Page 78 and 79: 16 in Poland)Rady powiatów(second
- Page 80 and 81: 3. Evaluation3.1. Candidate lists i
- Page 82 and 83: List, in Ozorków Women of Tomorrow
- Page 86 and 87: Case studySlovenia: from voluntary
- Page 88 and 89: council. The positions of candidate
- Page 90 and 91: 3.2.2. The introduction of legislat
- Page 92 and 93: Table 25 shows that only one of the
- Page 94 and 95: Source: Author’s own calculation
- Page 96 and 97: Zakon o volitvah v Evropski parlame
- Page 98 and 99: Advocates for quotas for women lobb
- Page 100 and 101: Table 31. The percentage and number
- Page 102 and 103: Table 33. Municipality elections in
- Page 104 and 105: Case studySweden: small steps, big
- Page 106 and 107: 40 per cent of either sex on the pa
- Page 108 and 109: voluntary party quotas than in part
- Page 110 and 111: The zipper system (50 per cent) int
- Page 112 and 113: While quotas for minority groups ha
- Page 114 and 115: Case studyThe United Kingdom: polit
- Page 116 and 117: In contrast to Labour, the Scottish
- Page 118 and 119: The twinning and zipping policies a
- Page 120 and 121: differences across the political pa
- Page 122 and 123: Appendix IThe methodology of the qu
- Page 124 and 125: Brigitte Geissel is a political sci
- Page 126: ZLSDZZPUnited List of Social Democr