council. The positions of c<strong>and</strong>idates are therefore not comparable – <strong>in</strong> the first the c<strong>and</strong>idatest<strong>and</strong>s as the <strong>in</strong>dividual c<strong>and</strong>idate, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the second as the member of the party list – <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> thiscase there is also a possibility to get a preferential vote. The latter has not yet worked for women.For elections to the <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament, Slovenia is a s<strong>in</strong>gle constituency. The system is List PR.The position on a list is important – especially s<strong>in</strong>ce the lead<strong>in</strong>g position almost guarantees success.There is also the possibility of a preferential vote, which can alter a c<strong>and</strong>idate’s possibility of be<strong>in</strong>gelected (as has once occurred, when the c<strong>and</strong>idate <strong>in</strong> the last position, but who was well known,was actually elected).3. The <strong>in</strong>troduction of quota provisions3.1. Voluntary party <strong>quotas</strong>Prior to the changes described below, two parties had <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>quotas</strong> <strong>in</strong>to <strong>their</strong> party statutes– the LDS <strong>and</strong> the Social Democrats (SD, previously the ZL <strong>and</strong> ZLSD), both left of centre on theideological spectrum. A strong women’s section <strong>in</strong> the ZLSD managed to <strong>in</strong>troduce a 40 per cent<strong>gender</strong> party quota before the general elections <strong>in</strong> 1996 on all party lists for all elections (AntićGaber <strong>and</strong> Lokar 2006). This was a real boost for women politicians <strong>in</strong> other parties. However,because of the poor results <strong>in</strong> the national election <strong>in</strong> 1996, for which the women’s share <strong>in</strong> theelectoral lists was (from the <strong>in</strong>fluential party leaders’ po<strong>in</strong>t of view) the reason, the ZLSD madequota provisions voluntary <strong>and</strong> not obligatory for the next election.The LDS agreed <strong>in</strong> its programme from 1990 to have 30 per cent <strong>quotas</strong> for the next election, butdid not act accord<strong>in</strong>gly. In 1994, it accepted the rule that made it obligatory to follow the 30 percent rule until the last stage of the nom<strong>in</strong>ation process (the party council’s nom<strong>in</strong>ation stage) forthe c<strong>and</strong>idate list for the national election. However, this was not reflected <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al result: whenthey were presented for the election, the party lists were composed of less than 20 per cent offemale c<strong>and</strong>idates.In 1998, the party’s Women’s Network made a <strong>gender</strong>-neutral proposal for <strong>quotas</strong> by which neither<strong>gender</strong> could have more than one-third of the c<strong>and</strong>idates on the party list for the national election(Antić Gaber 1998: 214). This share was reduced to 25 per cent for the 2000 election by a decisionto <strong>in</strong>crease it <strong>in</strong> each subsequent election by 3 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts, with a 40 per cent share of men<strong>and</strong> women set as the f<strong>in</strong>al objective. Influential women from the Women’s Network, with <strong>in</strong>ternalparty pressure, succeeded <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g quota provisions obligatory, <strong>and</strong> this was respected <strong>in</strong> bothsubsequent elections – <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>and</strong> 2004. In 2000, five women from the party made it to theParliament (out of 34 MPs). In 2004, after the party lost 11 seats, it still ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed three women <strong>in</strong>the parliamentary party group (out of 23 MPs 55 ).Table 22. Parties <strong>in</strong> Slovenia with voluntary <strong>quotas</strong> <strong>and</strong> other provisionsParty Year of<strong>in</strong>troductionQuota Rulesaboutrank<strong>in</strong>gWomenorneutralSanctions Implement<strong>in</strong>gBodySD(ZL,ZLSD)Sanctionsused1992 33% No Neutral No Presidency No 20.0WomenMPs ofthe party,2004 (%)55 The People’s Party tried to follow the track of the LDS <strong>and</strong> the SD (ZL, ZLSD) but has not <strong>in</strong>troduced party <strong>quotas</strong>; its ActionPlan anticipates a gradual <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of female c<strong>and</strong>idates <strong>in</strong> accordance with Equality Law.84
LDS 1998200033%25%NoNoNeutralNeutralNoNoPartycouncilNoNo13.0Source: Antić Gaber, Milica <strong>and</strong> Lokar, Sonja, ‘The Balkans: From Total Rejection to Gradual Acceptance ofGender Quotas’, <strong>in</strong> Drude Dahlerup (ed.), Women, Quotas <strong>and</strong> Politics (New York <strong>and</strong> London: Routledge,2006).The first two parties that <strong>in</strong>troduced voluntary party <strong>quotas</strong> were pioneers of <strong>gender</strong> equality <strong>in</strong>Slovenia, among political parties <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the political arena more widely. They made further steps <strong>in</strong>this respect more achievable.3.2. Legislated <strong>quotas</strong>After a period of stagnation <strong>in</strong> the second half of the 1990s of the political representation ofwomen <strong>in</strong> Slovenia, <strong>and</strong> after a few failures to get <strong>quotas</strong> accepted <strong>in</strong>to the law, awareness thatsometh<strong>in</strong>g should be done <strong>in</strong> this respect started to grow among the left-of-centre-oriented politicalelite.3.2.1. The preparation phaseThe first step was taken <strong>in</strong> June 2002, with the adoption of the Act on Equal Opportunities forWomen <strong>and</strong> Men, which conta<strong>in</strong>s several provisions for the promotion of <strong>gender</strong>-balancedparticipation <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. The most important are the follow<strong>in</strong>g. It determ<strong>in</strong>es:(a) that the establishment of equal opportunities is a duty of the entire society;(b) that it is the obligation of the National Assembly to respect the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of balancedrepresentation of women <strong>and</strong> men <strong>in</strong> the establishment of work<strong>in</strong>g bodies <strong>and</strong> the compositionof delegations; <strong>and</strong>(c) that the political parties have a duty to promote <strong>gender</strong>-balanced representation/participation; furthermore, political parties that are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the register of political partiesshall adopt a plan <strong>in</strong> which they shall determ<strong>in</strong>e methods <strong>and</strong> measures for the promotion ofmore balanced representation of women <strong>and</strong> men with<strong>in</strong> party bodies, <strong>and</strong> on c<strong>and</strong>idate lists forelections to the National Assembly <strong>and</strong> to bodies of local communities, as well as for electionsfor the president of the state.The second step was taken <strong>in</strong> June 2004, when the National Assembly adopted the ConstitutionalAct amend<strong>in</strong>g article 43 of the constitution of Slovenia. By this, it added to the provision onuniversal <strong>and</strong> equal rights, vot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a new paragraph conferr<strong>in</strong>g on the legislature the power todeterm<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>in</strong> a law, measures for encourag<strong>in</strong>g equal opportunities for women <strong>and</strong> men <strong>in</strong> st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gfor election to state authorities <strong>and</strong> local community authorities.The third step was taken <strong>in</strong> September 2004 when, <strong>in</strong> compliance with article 14 of the Act onEqual Opportunities for Women <strong>and</strong> Men, the government adopted a decree regulat<strong>in</strong>g the criteriafor <strong>implementation</strong> of the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of balanced representation of women <strong>and</strong> men. The decree laysdown the procedure for ensur<strong>in</strong>g balanced representation <strong>in</strong> the composition of work<strong>in</strong>g bodies,<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> appo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g government representatives. Both the decree <strong>and</strong> the act providethat the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of <strong>gender</strong>-balanced representation is respected when at least 40 per centrepresentation of women <strong>and</strong> men is ensured. In certa<strong>in</strong> specified circumstances the decree permitsexemptions from this pr<strong>in</strong>ciple on objectively justified grounds. Such an exemption is permitted <strong>in</strong>cases where membership of a particular government body stems from a particular function.85
- Page 3 and 4:
Directorate-General Internal Polici
- Page 5 and 6:
Electoral Gender Quota Systems andT
- Page 8 and 9:
AppendicesThe methodology of the qu
- Page 10 and 11:
Table 41. Women’s representation
- Page 12 and 13:
1. Mapping of electoral gender quot
- Page 14 and 15:
Committee of Ministers’ Recommend
- Page 16 and 17:
have occurred after election day -
- Page 18 and 19:
parties and take the form of intern
- Page 20 and 21:
Knowledge of different electoral qu
- Page 22 and 23:
support for female candidates has s
- Page 24 and 25:
of more women in politics. Many opp
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure 3. The incremental track mod
- Page 28 and 29:
is probably that gender quotas rema
- Page 30 and 31:
to gender quotas. Likewise, the dat
- Page 32 and 33:
‘Special organisation for women w
- Page 34 and 35:
individual parties that adopt them,
- Page 36 and 37:
political party in the Swedish Parl
- Page 38 and 39: then the requirement of 50 per cent
- Page 40 and 41: proportion of women elected in the
- Page 42 and 43: and organisation of women are cruci
- Page 44 and 45: Matland, Richard E., ‘Enhancing W
- Page 46 and 47: Case studyBelgium: a best practice
- Page 48 and 49: While the 1994 act applied to all e
- Page 50 and 51: need to include at least one woman,
- Page 52 and 53: introduced, individual parties adop
- Page 54 and 55: Marissal, Claudie and Hansen, Ingri
- Page 56 and 57: In order to correct the discriminat
- Page 58 and 59: The legal vacuum pertaining to the
- Page 60 and 61: y women in terms of number of seats
- Page 62 and 63: 5. ‘Virtuous dynamic’: the symb
- Page 64 and 65: Case studyGermany: successful quota
- Page 66 and 67: party positions (Gruppenwahlen zu P
- Page 68 and 69: districts, quota rules are often no
- Page 70 and 71: Table 14. Success rates of female a
- Page 72 and 73: Figure 5. Development of the percen
- Page 74 and 75: so far no formal rules have been ad
- Page 76 and 77: Case studyPoland: one step forward,
- Page 78 and 79: 16 in Poland)Rady powiatów(second
- Page 80 and 81: 3. Evaluation3.1. Candidate lists i
- Page 82 and 83: List, in Ozorków Women of Tomorrow
- Page 84 and 85: 3.4. Representation of women in oth
- Page 86 and 87: Case studySlovenia: from voluntary
- Page 90 and 91: 3.2.2. The introduction of legislat
- Page 92 and 93: Table 25 shows that only one of the
- Page 94 and 95: Source: Author’s own calculation
- Page 96 and 97: Zakon o volitvah v Evropski parlame
- Page 98 and 99: Advocates for quotas for women lobb
- Page 100 and 101: Table 31. The percentage and number
- Page 102 and 103: Table 33. Municipality elections in
- Page 104 and 105: Case studySweden: small steps, big
- Page 106 and 107: 40 per cent of either sex on the pa
- Page 108 and 109: voluntary party quotas than in part
- Page 110 and 111: The zipper system (50 per cent) int
- Page 112 and 113: While quotas for minority groups ha
- Page 114 and 115: Case studyThe United Kingdom: polit
- Page 116 and 117: In contrast to Labour, the Scottish
- Page 118 and 119: The twinning and zipping policies a
- Page 120 and 121: differences across the political pa
- Page 122 and 123: Appendix IThe methodology of the qu
- Page 124 and 125: Brigitte Geissel is a political sci
- Page 126: ZLSDZZPUnited List of Social Democr