12.07.2015 Views

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2006 <strong>No</strong>.3 <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> Economic SummaryAustralia’s weak productivity growth in the past few years is due mainly todecelerating output growth. <strong>Western</strong> Australia’s productivity turnaround -from strong growth in 2001-02 to 2003-04, to a dip in productivity in 2004-05and a modest rise in 2005-06 - is more puzzling, given its generally strongoutput growth over the past few years.As noted above, it seems highly likely that <strong>Western</strong> Australia’s recentproductivity record is linked to falling productivity in the mining sector, itslargest industry. So to explore the paradox <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> Australia’s weakproductivity, it is necessary to explore why mining productivity should befalling so sharply in the middle <strong>of</strong> a resources boom.Mining Sector ProductivityFigure 38 on page 57 shows productivity in the <strong>Australian</strong> mining industry.For multi-factor and particularly labour productivity, the recent trend hasbeen markedly downwards. Although state-based estimates <strong>of</strong> productivityby sector are not produced by the ABS, it is plausible that<strong>Western</strong> Australia’s mining productivity has followed a similar trend.At least three factors could explain why a boom in commodity prices mightlead to a fall in mining sector productivity, at least in the short term.Firstly, the rise in prices makes it pr<strong>of</strong>itable for miners to exploit previouslymarginal or uneconomic resources that yield a lower volume <strong>of</strong> output for agiven level <strong>of</strong> capital and labour inputs. Devoting substantial additionalresources to achieving modest additional output may be highly pr<strong>of</strong>itablefrom the business’s perspective, even if it means a fall in productivity asconventionally defined (the volume <strong>of</strong> output per unit <strong>of</strong> inputs).<strong>The</strong> 75% increase in employment in <strong>Western</strong> Australia’s mining sectorbetween September 2003 and September 2006 suggest that businesses areseeking to produce more from their existing assets and resources.Rising mining investment levels similarly indicate that the capital stock islikely to be expanding, although as the <strong>Australian</strong> Bureau <strong>of</strong> Statistics doesnot publish capital stock data by state there are no <strong>of</strong>ficial data describingtrends in <strong>Western</strong> Australia’s capital stock 1 .<strong>The</strong> second and related factor is that the depletion <strong>of</strong> resources that arecheap and easy to exploit may necessitate the use <strong>of</strong> less productiveresources to meet rising demand. This, too, could lead to rising costs andfalling productivity as rising demand is met from resources that are morecostly to produce.1 National data show that the mining sector’s real net capital stock rose by 25.2% inthe five years to 2005-06 (ABS Cat. 5204.0, Table 89).Investment cannot necessarily be assumed to generate growth in the capital stockbecause <strong>of</strong> depreciation and because some investment risks may not pay <strong>of</strong>f,resulting in capital expenditure exceeding the economic value <strong>of</strong> the assetpurchased.<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong> and Finance 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!