12.07.2015 Views

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2006 <strong>No</strong>.3 <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> Economic Summary<strong>Western</strong> Australia’s recent experience, <strong>of</strong> rapidly rising commodity pricesinducing strong growth in resource investment but as yet no commensurateincrease in output volumes, seems consistent with such a model.For a cobweb to eventuate, however, at least two other conditions wouldneed to be satisfied: other producers around the world would similarly needto be increasing supply, and producers would need to be unaware <strong>of</strong> thissupply response and thus fail to anticipate lower prices in future. While thefirst <strong>of</strong> these conditions is plausible, the second is less so.Business as usual<strong>The</strong> final scenario is business as usual, meaning a resumption <strong>of</strong> theprevailing trend before the recent commodity price rises, not a continuation<strong>of</strong> current trends. For global commodity markets this would mean that thecurrent round <strong>of</strong> prices is no more than an exceptionally strong example <strong>of</strong>the normal volatility <strong>of</strong> commodity prices. Once supply has adjusted anddemand perhaps eases a little, the prices <strong>of</strong> commodities would drop back.In the longer term, commodity prices would resume their trend declinecompared to prices <strong>of</strong> other goods and services.This scenario assumes that recent price rise is no more than a temporaryphenomenon as supply adjusts to new demand levels. It reflects suspicionthat the “super cycle” theory ignores the economic reality <strong>of</strong> supplyresponses, and is reminiscent <strong>of</strong> the hype <strong>of</strong> the “new economy” and otherpast property, share and other price bubbles, which have almost alwaysbeen attended by optimistic speculation that this time the boom will not endin a bust.Modelling the EffectsIf the IMF and World Bank are right in their expectations that prices willdecline, but not to pre-boom levels, then the effects <strong>of</strong> the recent demandshock will not fade completely once prices peak in the current cycle.<strong>The</strong> DTF 1 has attempted to model the economic implications <strong>of</strong> theresources boom for <strong>Western</strong> Australia using the MMRF-Green computablegeneral equilibrium model 2 . <strong>The</strong> aim was to determine whether apermanent increase in global demand for the State’s key commodity exportscould improve welfare, notwithstanding an assumed decline in miningsector productivity. <strong>The</strong> simulation was carried out in two parts.1 This analysis was presented by Kurt Sibma at the 2006 CGE Modellers’ Conferencein Perth. A paper describing the results and methodology in more detail will bepublished later in 2006-07.2 <strong>The</strong> MMRF-Green model is a multi-regional, dynamic model developed by theMonash University Centre <strong>of</strong> Policy Studies, with Australia separated into differentregions. MMFR-Green is documented in detail in Adams, Horridge and Wittwer(2003).<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong> and Finance 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!