12.07.2015 Views

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> Economic Summary2006 <strong>No</strong>.3IntroductionComputable General Equilibrium (CGE) models are commonly used inAustralia to evaluate the merits <strong>of</strong> proposals from companies or projects forgovernment support. Project proponents will <strong>of</strong>ten submit a CGE analysissupporting their request for assistance, while governments will <strong>of</strong>tenconduct their own analyses to gauge the merit <strong>of</strong> proposals.However, unlike Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA), a standard set <strong>of</strong> assumptionsand outputs have never been formalised by the CGE modelling community.Partly as a result <strong>of</strong> this, governments across Australia have not specifiedwhat they require in an analysis to make judgments on the merits <strong>of</strong>proposals.This has meant that a variety <strong>of</strong> assumptions have been used and outputspresented. Additionally, past analyses have tended not to be verytransparent with their assumptions. <strong>The</strong>re seems to be a perception that aCGE modelling analysis is the truth no matter what. In reality, however, theassumptions used will <strong>of</strong>ten determine the result <strong>of</strong> a modelling run evenbefore any buttons are pressed on a computer.Finally, the outputs presented have rarely been the types required forgovernments to make an informed decision on whether the project wouldmake their citizens better <strong>of</strong>f. That is, will assisting a project increaseeconomic welfare? Instead, the economic impact <strong>of</strong> particular proposals isthe most common output, but this should have no place in thedecision-making process.This paper discusses many <strong>of</strong> these issues in the context <strong>of</strong> requests forassistance to the <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Government</strong>. It does not aim to beoverly prescriptive, as the flexibility <strong>of</strong> CGE models to adapt to manysituations is one <strong>of</strong> their major strengths. Instead it suggests some ‘standard’methods, assumptions and outputs, and notes that shifting away from theseassumptions is acceptable, but the alternative assumptions used must bejustified by sound logic or empirical evidence.This paper is designed as a less technical version <strong>of</strong> Layman (2006), and isalso slightly less comprehensive than the technical paper. It is recommendedthat modellers should read the more technical paper for exactimplementation <strong>of</strong> the issues contained below.<strong>The</strong> paper will make many comments such as “in CGE analyses to date” or“usually” without references. This is because most <strong>of</strong> the analyses thatmotivated this paper have been confidential submissions to the<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Government</strong>, and so cannot be directly quoted here. <strong>The</strong>generalities presented are from the author’s direct experience <strong>of</strong> many suchproposals.At this stage, this paper is structured as a discussion <strong>of</strong> issues rather than alist <strong>of</strong> requirements for submitting modelling to the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong>and Finance (DTF). However, the issues discussed in this paper willprobably form the basis for a publication <strong>of</strong> such requirements some time inthe future.76 <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong> and Finance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!