12.07.2015 Views

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

No. 3 - Department of Treasury - The Western Australian Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> Economic Summary2006 <strong>No</strong>.3<strong>The</strong> types <strong>of</strong> projects (usually large resource-processing projects) thatrequest assistance from the <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Government</strong> are verycomplex, expensive and risky. While the initial financial analysis <strong>of</strong> a projectmight paint an optimistic picture, there are a multitude <strong>of</strong> things that can gowrong, especially price changes for construction and intermediate inputs inremote locations.Risk in a public CBA is better explicitly identified rather than beingincorporated into the discount rate (Sugden and Williams, 1978, p. 62), andthis line <strong>of</strong> reasoning is also justifiable for a CGE analysis. This is because, ina public CBA, the public discount rate is the Marginal Rate <strong>of</strong> TimePreference (MRTP) for money. <strong>The</strong> MRTP for money simply representssociety’s valuation <strong>of</strong> a dollar today versus a dollar tomorrow, and not theopportunity cost <strong>of</strong> capital or the risk associated with the project, as wouldbe evaluated by a financial analysis <strong>of</strong> a company.This means that the modeller must run several scenarios based on potentialoutcomes for the project. A probability <strong>of</strong> each outcome must be assigned toeach scenario and a net result calculated.Assigning probabilities is a subjective exercise, but a long enough historyexists to show that, contrary to many project assistance submissions, themost optimistic scenario for multiple project starts almost never occurs.ConclusionThis paper outlines several issues relevant to the modelling <strong>of</strong> a request forassistance to the <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Government</strong> from a potential majorresource project. It canvasses the theoretical basis for modelling the project,the steps involved in an analysis and the assumptions that should beincluded.Following the recommendations in this paper should allow projectproponents and their CGE modelling consultants to produce results that willenable the <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Government</strong> to make a reasonable assessment<strong>of</strong> whether assisting the particular project will enhance the net economicwelfare <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Australian</strong>s.While only a discussion <strong>of</strong> issues at this stage, it is anticipated that in thenear future the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong> and Finance will draw up a set <strong>of</strong>guidelines based on these issues that project proponents must follow fortheir proposal to be considered.Comments and suggestions can be forwarded to the author, Bruce Layman,at the contact address and phone number given at the beginning <strong>of</strong> thispublication.88 <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Treasury</strong> and Finance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!