12.07.2015 Views

Science vs. religion : what scientists really think - File PDF

Science vs. religion : what scientists really think - File PDF

Science vs. religion : what scientists really think - File PDF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Suppression or Engagement 77almost entirely a personal, private matter of being motivated by the desire tocare more for students. Other <strong>scientists</strong>, by far the smallest minority, worktoward actual, dynamic, public discussion.SCRIPTS OF SUPPRESSIONAs I talked with <strong>scientists</strong>, I found some who were propelled by current religiouschallenges in public schools to erect a strong barrier between scienceand <strong>religion</strong>. The most benign argument was that science and <strong>religion</strong> are incompletely separate realms. To a lesser extent, some argued that <strong>religion</strong> andthe opinions of religious people are so meaningless that they are simply notworth discussing. So even if students bring up <strong>religion</strong> in the classroom, these<strong>scientists</strong> believe it is best to simply ignore it. In particular, many of those whotaught at public universities could not imagine how <strong>religion</strong> could be discussedin the classroom in a way that would not violate the separation ofchurch and state. Responses like these reveal the kinds of boundaries thatsome <strong>scientists</strong> set up between <strong>religion</strong> and academic life. And boundarieshave powerful implications for how <strong>religion</strong> and science connect in universityclassrooms.“That’s Not What I’m Here For”I asked a chemist 8 who teaches at an Ivy League school how he responds whenstudents bring up issues related to <strong>religion</strong> during the chemistry courses heteaches. He said emphatically that he “would not engage in a discussion about<strong>religion</strong> with students inside [his] office or [his] classroom.” His reluctance todiscuss matters of faith occurs out of principle: It is “not because I’m necessarilyafraid of the consequences,” he said, “but that’s not <strong>what</strong> I’m here for. I’mnot a professor of <strong>religion</strong>, and I would not discuss religious matters with studentsin an academic teaching or research setting.” This chemist’s sentimentsecho those of other <strong>scientists</strong> who <strong>think</strong> it simply wrong to talk about mattersof faith in class when they do not know enough about these matters. They arenot experts on <strong>religion</strong>, and such discussions take time away from the areas onwhich they are.Even <strong>scientists</strong> who <strong>think</strong> that <strong>religion</strong> should never enter into teaching scienceoften ironically have a great personal interest in matters of faith and theirconnection to science. This is not to say, however, that they have much respect

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!