12.07.2015 Views

Science vs. religion : what scientists really think - File PDF

Science vs. religion : what scientists really think - File PDF

Science vs. religion : what scientists really think - File PDF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78Society and Broader Publicsfor <strong>religion</strong>. My interview with one biologist 9 caught me off guard: Although he<strong>think</strong>s that <strong>religion</strong> should generally not be discussed in academic settings, hewas so eager to talk about the negative connections between <strong>religion</strong>, spirituality,and science that my interview with him lasted over two and a half hours. Atone point, I asked him if <strong>religion</strong> ever comes up as a topic in his interactionswith students. He adamantly replied that even if a student does mention it, hetries hard to suppress such discussions. He specifically explained why he <strong>think</strong>sstudents do not talk about <strong>religion</strong> very much: Since he “teaches advancedundergraduates and graduate students, by that time . . . the people who want totake [the kind of high-level courses he teaches] are just not religious in the firstplace.” In his words, “they’re certainly mature enough not to come up to youand start talking about creation or something.” One wonders how this biologistknows how religious his students are, since he squelches their religious talkor forces them to face being considered not “mature.”Like many of the faculty I spoke with, this biologist has had little positiveexperience with <strong>religion</strong>. He said he has been an atheist since he was four yearsold, and he subsequently has little knowledge of the range of ways <strong>scientists</strong>might talk about the connections between <strong>religion</strong> and science. He furtherwent on to illustrate with an analogy just how irrelevant <strong>religion</strong> is to science:I mean it’s as if you were asking me, “Is alchemy a topic of conversation in thechemistry department?” Well, I’m not in the chemistry department, but I feelabsolutely sure it isn’t . . . . I <strong>think</strong> that <strong>religion</strong> should have been discarded at least25 hundred years ago . . . . I see the fact that we have it at this school as a horridanachronism.It should be kept in mind that there is not a large group of <strong>scientists</strong> who are soextremely hostile to <strong>religion</strong> (less than 5 percent of those I interviewed). Yetthose who are this hostile are often the most outspoken, making it appear toscience students as if more <strong>scientists</strong> are hostile to <strong>religion</strong> than <strong>really</strong> are.“Religion Has No Place Here”A chemist 10 who teaches at a large state university in the West explained thathe strongly “believes in separation of church and state.” For much of theinterview, he was laid-back, not conveying the ivory tower aura with whichacademics are so often associated. As he started to talk about <strong>religion</strong> enteringteaching, however, he lost his easygoing manner and became more animated,waving his hands as he talked:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!