12.07.2015 Views

the microbanking bulletin - Microfinance Information Exchange

the microbanking bulletin - Microfinance Information Exchange

the microbanking bulletin - Microfinance Information Exchange

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FEATURE ARTICLESable clients. These clients often take larger loans toexpand <strong>the</strong> working capital of <strong>the</strong>ir businesses or tofinance asset acquisition. The MFI will make mostof its profits on <strong>the</strong>se larger loans since <strong>the</strong> cost ofadministering a loan is almost <strong>the</strong> same irrespectiveof its size. These long-term customers should alsobe better credit risks—although this is subject todebate. And crucially, <strong>the</strong>se larger-loan clientsallow <strong>the</strong> MFI to finance its smaller loans to poorerclients. The last thing that an MFI, with its sightsset on financial sustainability, wants to see is <strong>the</strong>graduation of <strong>the</strong>se precious clients. Instead, MFIsshould retain <strong>the</strong>m by seeking to meet <strong>the</strong>ir needsthrough a range of client-responsive financialservices.Conclusions for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Microfinance</strong> IndustryThere is compelling evidence, not just fromBangladesh, to support <strong>the</strong> contention that mostdropouts occur because MFIs do not meet <strong>the</strong>needs of <strong>the</strong>ir market. Dropouts are expensive forMFIs, in terms of money already invested that islost when <strong>the</strong> member leaves, and <strong>the</strong> lost potentialbusiness from that member in <strong>the</strong> future. MFIsseeking to develop permanent sustainable organizationsshould improve <strong>the</strong>ir services to reduce clientdissatisfaction and thus desertion. Such a strategyis likely to prove cost-effective.For MFIs committed to creating permanent institutions,graduating <strong>the</strong> most experienced and affluentclients into <strong>the</strong> formal banking system is not adesirable strategy as it implies <strong>the</strong> loss of <strong>the</strong> mostvaluable and cost-effective clients. Indeed, MFIsshould tailor <strong>the</strong>ir services to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y retain<strong>the</strong>se high value customers.For all <strong>the</strong>se reasons, MFIs should pay (and indeedare paying) close attention to <strong>the</strong> nature and qualityof <strong>the</strong>ir financial services. The trade-off between<strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> services and cost of providing<strong>the</strong>m is clear, but finding <strong>the</strong> right balance isdifficult. To date, MFIs in Bangladesh have put toomuch emphasis on trying to implement standardized,inflexible, low-cost, credit-driven systemswhen <strong>the</strong>ir clients are asking (and willing to pay) fora broader range of quality services.The irony of this situation was that <strong>the</strong> genesis ofmicrofinance in Bangladesh was originally driven byan extensive program of careful market and operationsresearch designed to understand <strong>the</strong> needsof <strong>the</strong> clients. Professor Yunus’ work with his studentsat Chittagong University in <strong>the</strong> village ofJobra in 1976 was quintessential market research.It is to <strong>the</strong> fundamentals of market research andproduct development that MFIs must return if <strong>the</strong>yare to retain clients and build sustainableinstitutions.Graham Wright is Programme Director of MicroSave-Africa, Chair of CGAP’s Savings Mobilisation WorkingGroup and a Research Associate at <strong>the</strong> Institute ofDevelopment Policy and Management, University ofManchester, UK. He can be reached atGraham@MicroSave-Africa.com.ReferencesBrand, M. and J. Gerschick. (2000). Maximizing Efficiency in<strong>Microfinance</strong>: The Path to Enhanced Outreach andSustainability. Washington: ACCION International.Hulme, D. (1999). “Client Exits (Drop outs) from East AfricanMicro-Finance Institutions.” Kampala: MicroSave-Africa.Khan, Md. K. A. and A.M.R. Chowdhury (1995). “Why VOMembers Drop Out.” Dhaka: BRAC.Matin, I. (1998). “Informal Credit Transactions of Micro-CreditBorrowers in Rural Bangladesh.” mimeo, Dhaka.Mustafa, S, et al. (1996). “Beacon of Hope: An ImpactAssessment Study of BRAC’s Rural DevelopmentProgramme.” Dhaka: BRAC.PromPT (1996). "Financial Services for <strong>the</strong> Rural Poor -Users' Perspectives." Dhaka: PromPT.Ru<strong>the</strong>rford, S (1995). ASA: The Biography of an NGO,Empowerment and Credit in Rural Bangladesh. Dhaka: ASA.Wright, G.A.N. (2000). “<strong>Microfinance</strong>: The Solution or aProblem?” in MicroFinance Systems: Designing QualityFinancial Services for <strong>the</strong> Poor. Dhaka: University PressLimited and London: Zed Books.16 MICROBANKING BULLETIN, APRIL 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!