12.07.2015 Views

TPA-PPN-Full-with-gl..

TPA-PPN-Full-with-gl..

TPA-PPN-Full-with-gl..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Project Professional Notes213. The disputed appropriateness of using the hadith referring to washing one’s handsoutside before immersing it into a vessel of water after sleeping as proof for this issue.4. The disputed appropriateness of using the hadith regarding urinating in stagnant wateras proof for this issue.Summary, Rebuttals, Conclusion: Please refer to each proof above for the rebuttalsthat scholars offered <strong>with</strong> regards to it.Usool: A direct proof is stronger than an indirect (derived understanding) proof.NOTE:Since a direct proof is stronger than an indirect proof, the hadith that states that, “Water ispure and nothing can defile it” is a stronger proof than the indirect proofs offered.Strongest Opinion:Imaam Maalik’s, Imaam Hajar alAskilani’s, Ibn Taymiyyah’s, and ImaamDaawood Adh-Dhaahiri’s that states that say this water is pure and purifyingunless one of its characteristics changes.If you put a drop of an outside substance into Tahoor water and it changes a characteristic of the water(taste, odor, or color), scholars say that you cannot use this water for purification purposes. What about tapwater (chlorine and fluoride changes the characteristics of the water)? Some Hanbali scholars say that, aslong as you can call it water, then it is permissible to use. This does not go against the ijma’. It takes thesame consideration as putting water into plastic container, which transfers the smell of plastic into the water(the smell is hard to get rid of).واالله أعلمii. Issue #2: Water that has already been used for purification.Agreement: Water that has already been used for purification but while in the process ofpurification has been defiled by something impure (najis) which has changed its taste,smell or color is considered impure (najis).Disagreement: The scholars disagree on the issue of water that has been used but hasnot been defiled by an impure substance.First Opinion: A narration of Imaam Maalik, a narration of Imaam AshShafi’ee, anarration of Imaam Ahmed, and Imam Dhaahiri says that the water is still pure andpurifying. (Some Maaliki scholars considered it to be Makrooh.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!