Table A5.2: Other study constraintsDefinitelyMostlyNeitherMostlyDefinitelyBaseagreeagreeagree ordisagreedisagreeNdisagreeNot enough<strong>time</strong> to studyStruggle withstudy and othercommitmentsWorry aboutcosts of studyStaff recognisepressures22 40 21 13 3 2,62534 44 11 8 3 2,62416 24 25 16 19 2,11721 41 16 15 8 2,579Base: All students that report item is applicable to them.Source: London South Bank University – <strong>UK</strong> <strong>Part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> Student Survey 2005Table A6.1: Attitudes the costs of study and the returns of HEDefinitelyMostlyNeitherMostlyDefinitelyBaseagreeagreeagree ordisagreedisagreeNdisagreeCourse is good value formoneyWill benefit financiallyfrom courseWill benefit socially fromcourse30 43 21 4 1 2,58333 33 21 7 6 2,55124 32 32 7 6 2,580Base: All students that report item is applicable to them.Source: London South Bank University – <strong>UK</strong> <strong>Part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> Student Survey 2005<strong>Part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> students and <strong>part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> study: Strand 3 <strong>Universities</strong> <strong>UK</strong> 79
9 Appendix 2 – Technical report9.1 SamplingThe survey was intended to cover a representative sample of <strong>part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> students currently studyingat a randomly selected 25 HEIs in the <strong>UK</strong>, who had <strong>In</strong>ternet/email access.It was the responsibility of each HEI to email all their eligible <strong>part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> students, inviting them to<strong>part</strong>icipate in the survey online. GfK NOP provided a standard email invitation, which was sent outto each HEI. A definition of what constitutes an eligible <strong>part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> student was also given to eachHEI, to ensure consistent sample selection criteria across all HEIs.The following definition of a <strong>part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> student was therefore used:• Must be a <strong>UK</strong> national.• Must be currently studying on a credit bearing course.• Must NOT be a postgraduate.• Can be an undergraduate on a first degree (ordinary or honours), or an otherundergraduate, which – defined by HESA – includes qualification aims below degree levelsuch as foundation degrees, diplomas in HE with eligibility to register to practice with a healthor social care regulatory body, higher national diploma (HND), higher national certificate(HNC), diploma of higher education (DipHE), certificate of higher education (CertHE),foundation courses at HE level, NVQ/SVQ levels 4 and 5, post-degree diplomas andcertificates at undergraduate level, professional qualifications at undergraduate level, otherundergraduate diplomas and certificates including post registration health and social carecourses, other formal HE qualifications of less than degree standard, institutionalundergraduate credit and no formal undergraduate qualifications.This was a self-completion survey conducted via the <strong>In</strong>ternet, and as well as relying on thestudents’ own interest to <strong>part</strong>icipate, we also had to account for the fact that not all eligible studentswere accessible via email. GfK NOP also had no prior knowledge of what proportion of those <strong>part</strong><strong>time</strong>students with access to the <strong>In</strong>ternet actually used the email addresses supplied by their HEI –nor did the HEIs. Given the limited resources for this project, the HEIs did not have the opportunityof contacting those without email access by other means, such as post or telephone. Also,contacting non-respondents was not possible, as this would have created a large amount of extrawork for the HEIs, since GfK NOP was unable to contact students directly because of dataprotection issues.Being a self-completion survey, it is also important to recognise that responses are often biasedtowards those who show most interest – which are commonly those people who are <strong>part</strong>icularlyunhappy or happy with a given situation (ie, in this case their <strong>part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> study). This bias thereforeneeds to be taken into consideration when analysing the findings.<strong>Part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> students and <strong>part</strong>-<strong>time</strong> study: Strand 3 <strong>Universities</strong> <strong>UK</strong> 80