Effect of Automatic Sprinkler Protection on Smoke Control Systems

More documents

Recommendations

Info

fire source and contributes to increasing the burning rate(Alpert attd Ward 1983), If the heat flux is high enough,combustible materials will ignite, or vulnerable surfaces,such as windows, could be broken. Alpert and Ward (1983)report that a.radiant flux <strong>of</strong> about 1.8 Btu/s·ft 2 (20 kW/ru 2 )will cause most combustible materials to ignite from anysmall pilot flame within a few minutes. Certain plastics willignite at lower flux levels. Furthermore, tempered glass islikely to break at a heat flux greater than 1.8 Btu/s·ft 2 (20kW/m2) (Kim and Lougheed 1990). It is advantageous,therefore, to reduce the intensity <strong>of</strong> radiant heat energy inthe fire compartment.Figure 5 demonstrates that the radiant heat at thelocation <strong>of</strong> the heat flux meter was measured at about 1.1Btuift 2 (12.5 kW im 2 ) for the unsprinklered fire. Althoughnot high enough in itself to have readily ignited mostmaterials, it is the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the reduction in heat fluxcaused by the sprinklers that is <strong>of</strong> interest. Even in acontrolled situation, sprinklers were effective in reducingradiant heat energy on the walls <strong>of</strong> the test .room by morethan 65% to less than 0.4 Btu/s·ft2 (4.8 kW/m2). The plotalso reveals that, with some variability in test results, therewas an abrupt improvement in the heat flux reduction at athreshold spray density. The major benefit in heat fluxreduction occurred at spray densities greater than 0.09gpmift 2 (3.7 L/min·m 2 ).<strong>Effect</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sprinkler</strong>s on Room TemperaturesFigures 6 and 7 show a series <strong>of</strong> temperature pr<strong>of</strong>ilesin the one-story test room at different rates <strong>of</strong> sprinklerspray application and room ventilation. Each pr<strong>of</strong>ile isplotted for a time during which burning conditions andtemperatures in the room had stabilized after any changesin spray density or ventilation rate: Figure 6 shows thetemperature pr<strong>of</strong>iles at different spray densities at a ventilationrate <strong>of</strong> 1,000 cfm (0.42 rri'is). Figure 7 shows similartemperature pr<strong>of</strong>iles for a ventilation rate <strong>of</strong> 1,500 cfm(0.63 m 3 /s). It is evident in Figure 7 that increasing theventilation rate for the unsprinklered fire greatly increasedthe heat output and room temperature. With sprinklersoperating, however, the increased ventilation caused onlyslight temperature increases.With the sprinklers shut <strong>of</strong>f, temperatures in the upperpart <strong>of</strong> the room reached approximately 1500•F (820°C) ata ventilation rate <strong>of</strong> 1,000 cfm (0.42 m 3 /s) and 1700°F(926°C) for a ventilation rate <strong>of</strong> 1,500 cfm (0.63 m 3 /s).These high temperatures existed throughout most <strong>of</strong> theheight <strong>of</strong> the room, and temperatures near the floor were·still more than 1200•F (650°C), Such temperatures represent"flashover" conditions, which implies that everycombustible in a compartment would have become involvedin the fire. Fires that reach flashover have a high probability<strong>of</strong> spreading beyond the compartment <strong>of</strong> origin andtherefore represent an augmented risk to the rest <strong>of</strong> thebuilding, according to a statistical review <strong>of</strong> fires in <strong>of</strong>ficeand residential high-rise buildings (Mailvaganam et a!.1992; Takeda and Yung 1991). It follows that there willalso be a high probability that smoke will spread beyond thecompartment <strong>of</strong> origin if flashover conditions are reached.What is striking about the temperature pr<strong>of</strong>iles inFigures 6 and 7 is the extent to which temperatures wereTemperature, •c0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000123.5II2<strong>Sprinkler</strong> Density10I . 0.000 gpm/ft 2 3.0.::::92. 0.067 " E.: 8 2.5 .:3. 0.084 0 " 0..: 7c4. 0.105> "2.06 " >"0.. s . 0.109 " 5.81.5...0.E 6 . 0.110 ".2!' 4-..c7. ·;:;:I: " 3 1.0 :I:2 Room Ventilation Rate- 1000 cfm0.5I0.200 "..0 0.0200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800Temperature, •FFigure 6Temperature pr<strong>of</strong>iles at north thermocouple tree in the one-story test room for different spray application rates,for ventilation rate <strong>of</strong> 1,000 cfm (0.42 m 3 Is).ASHRAE Transactions: Research 501
i.·t~', ~··~-:t··.a:Temperature, oc0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000123.5II 3<strong>Sprinkler</strong> Density10I. 0.000 gpmift 2 3.0.::: 92 . 0.084 "E.: 8 2.50 3. 0.105 "~0 0
Page 4 and 5: smoke from the building. Studies su
Page 6 and 7: hI'J]48'i'12.8'Air Serv. Eev. Eev.
Page 8 and 9: 1An uncertainty analysis, applied t
Page 12 and 13: stages of a ftre,
Page 14 and 15: horizontally throughout the fire co
Page 16 and 17: tions of 10,000 pp
Page 18 and 19: Ipressurized zone before opening do
Page 21 and 22: LiP design = 0.05 in. H20 (12.5 Pa)

Effect of Automatic Sprinkler Protection on Smoke Control Systems

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?